x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Historical Perspectives
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2016 and 2020.
Author
- Cohn, David E2
- Kesterson, Joshua P2
- Suarez, Adrian A2
- Swailes, Alexa L2
- Backes, Floor J1
- Berkowitz, Ross S1
- Bregar, Amy J1
- Cosgrove, Casey M1
- Creasman, William T1
- DiSilvestro, Paul A1
- Durfee, John1
- Felix, Ashley S1
- Filiaci, Virginia1
- Geller, Melissa A1
- Gockley, Allison1
- Goodfellow, Paul J1
- Hossler, Carrie E1
- Landrum, Lisa M1
- Lankes, Heather A1
- Lele, Shashikant B1
- Miller, David S1
- Miller, David Scott1
- Mutch, David G1
- Pearl, Michael L1
- Powell, Matthew A1
Keyword
- Cervical cancer2
- Endometrial cancer2
- Cancer risk1
- Cervical cytology1
- Combined Lynch syndrome screening and molecular classification1
- Cytoreductive surgery1
- Endometrial carcinoma1
- Endometrioid endometrial cancer1
- Exfoliative cytology1
- Gynecologic Oncology Group1
- Metabolic syndrome1
- Molecular classification1
- NRG Oncology1
- Obesity1
- Ovarian cancer1
- Papanicolaou1
- Primary debulking1
- Prognosis1
- Radical abdominal hysterectomy1
- Risk factor1
- Wertheim hysterectomy1
Historical Perspectives
6 Results
- Historical Perspective
Progress in endometrial cancer: Contributions of the former Gynecologic Oncology Group
Gynecologic OncologyVol. 157Issue 2p312–322Published online: January 31, 2020- David Scott Miller
- Marcus E. Randall
- Virginia Filiaci
Cited in Scopus: 4For over forty years, the Gynecologic Oncology Group drove progress in treating endometrial cancer. The first decades of investigation began with a meticulous prospective, surgicopathologic staging study that was the platform for development of all subsequent trials. The resultant statistical model of low risk, intermediate risk, and high-risk groups of patients led to trials where therapeutic modalities were best targeted at disease spread. A clear role for chemotherapy was established. It was realized that greater advances might be achieved with the advent of newer anti-neoplastic agents and these agents were subjected to extensive phase II testing. - Historical Perspective
Pathway to the Papanicolaou smear: The development of cervical cytology in twentieth-century America and implications in the present day
Gynecologic OncologyVol. 154Issue 1p3–7Published online: April 14, 2019- Alexa L. Swailes
- Carrie E. Hossler
- Joshua P. Kesterson
Cited in Scopus: 7George Papanicolaou, a Greek immigrant and cytopathologist, was responsible for what is now colloquially known as the “Pap smear”—undoubtedly one of the greatest advances in medicine and public health of the last century. However, his landmark research on the development of cervical cytology for the detection of precancerous lesions of the cervix (“New Cancer Diagnosis,” 1928) made a rather inauspicious debut in an unlikely venue: John Harvey Kellogg's Third Race Betterment Conference—a meeting devoted to the furtherance of the concept and implementation of eugenics. - Historical Perspective
Meigs to modern times: The evolution of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
Gynecologic OncologyVol. 149Issue 3p447–454Published online: March 7, 2018- John O. Schorge
- Amy J. Bregar
- John Durfee
- Ross S. Berkowitz
Cited in Scopus: 13Joe V. Meigs was a visionary clinician and an early adopter of radical techniques in the surgical treatment of ovarian cancer. His 1934 textbook “Tumors of the Female Pelvic Organs”, consolidated his approach to this “hopeless” disease, with pearls on diagnosis, outcomes, and even speculations about the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Decades before adjuvant chemotherapy would prove of value, and in an era when sophisticated statistics were unheard of, he nonetheless tried to eke out what benefits he could using the methods available in his time. - Research Article
An NRG Oncology/GOG study of molecular classification for risk prediction in endometrioid endometrial cancer
Gynecologic OncologyVol. 148Issue 1p174–180Published online: November 11, 2017- Casey M. Cosgrove
- David L. Tritchler
- David E. Cohn
- David G. Mutch
- Craig M. Rush
- Heather A. Lankes
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 74The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of a simplified, clinically accessible classification system for endometrioid endometrial cancers combining Lynch syndrome screening and molecular risk stratification. - Historical Perspective
The Wertheim hysterectomy: Development, modifications, and impact in the present day
Gynecologic OncologyVol. 145Issue 1p3–8Published online: January 14, 2017- Alexa L Swailes
- Allison Gockley
- Rébécca Phaëton
- Joshua P. Kesterson
Cited in Scopus: 14Ernst Wertheim was a pioneer in the history of the surgical treatment of cervical cancer. His English-language manuscript “The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases),” which was published in 1912, detailed his standardization of the radical hysterectomy and formed the basis of the current treatment for early stage cervical cancer. We contextualize the Wertheim hysterectomy, emphasizing medical advances that allowed for its development and subsequent modification. - Historical Perspective
Bokhman Redux: Endometrial cancer “types” in the 21st century
Gynecologic OncologyVol. 144Issue 2p243–249Published online: December 16, 2016- Adrian A. Suarez
- Ashley S. Felix
- David E. Cohn
Cited in Scopus: 93In 1983 Jan V. Bokhman, M.D. published a landmark paper entitled “Two Pathogenetic Types of Endometrial Carcinoma” in which an enduring dualistic view of endometrial cancer was first proposed. “Type I” cancers are thought to represent estrogen driven mostly low grade endometrioid tumors strongly associated with obesity and other components of the metabolic syndrome. “Type II” cancers represent higher grade non-endometrioid tumors for which the latter associations are less significant. Basic tenets of this dichotomy including significant prognostic differences have been abundantly confirmed by later literature.