Advertisement

Creating work environments where people of all genders in gynecologic oncology can thrive: An SGO evidence-based review

Published:January 06, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.032

      Highlights

      • All gynecologic oncology team members should have equal opportunities to advance in their careers.
      • Institutions should have systems to report sexual misconduct and apply zero-tolerance policies.
      • Gender-neutral mechanisms for mentorship, advancement and inclusion should be developed.
      • Work-life integration policies, including respect for parenting choices, will improve productivity and retention.

      Abstract

      Equality, equity, and parity in the workplace are necessary to optimize patient care across all aspects of medicine. Gender-based inequities remain an obstacle to quality of care, including within the now majority women subspecialty of gynecologic oncology. The results of the 2020 SGO State of the Society Survey prompted this evidence-based review. Evidence related to relevant aspects of the clinical care model by which women with malignancies are cared for is summarized. Recommendations are made that include ways to create work environments where all members of a gynecologic oncology clinical care team, regardless of gender, can thrive. These recommendations aim to improve equality and equity within the specialty and, in doing so, elevate the care that our patients receive.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gynecologic Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. The Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2020 State of the Society Survey. 2020
        • Heisler C.A.
        • et al.
        Has a critical mass of women resulted in gender equity in gynecologic surgery?.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 223: 665-673
        • Stasenko M.
        • et al.
        Sexual harassment and gender discrimination in gynecologic oncology.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 159 (Epub 2020 Aug 22. PMID: 32839027; PMCID: PMC7584749): 317-321https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.014
        • Temkin S.M.
        • et al.
        Take me to your leader: reporting structures and equity in academic gynecologic oncology.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2020; 157: 759-764
        • Croft K.M.
        • et al.
        Compensation differences by gender in gynecologic oncology.
        in: SGO 2020 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer. SGO, 2020
        • Lautenberger D.
        • Dandar V.
        The state of women in academic medicine 2018-2019.
        in: Exploring Pathways to Equity. 2020
        • AAMC
        Table 13: U.S. medical school faculty by sex.
        Rank, and Department. 2019; (2019 09/17/2020]; Available from:)
        • National Academies of Sciences, E. and Medicine
        Sexual harassment of women: climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine.
        National Academies Press, 2018
        • Stephens E.H.
        • et al.
        The current status of women in surgery: how to affect the future.
        JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155: 876-885
        • von Gruenigen V.E.
        • Karlan B.Y.
        Sexual harassment in the work place: its impact on gynecologic oncology and women’s health.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2018; 149: 227-229
        • Jagsi R.
        Sexual harassment in medicine — #MeToo.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2017; 378: 209-211
        • Salles A.
        • et al.
        Estimating implicit and explicit gender Bias among health care professionals and surgeons.
        JAMA Netw. Open. 2019; 2e196545
        • Periyakoil V.S.
        • et al.
        Common types of gender-based microaggressions in medicine.
        Acad. Med. 2019; 95: 450-457
        • Miner K.N.
        • Cortina L.M.
        Observed workplace incivility toward women, perceptions of interpersonal injustice, and observer occupational well-being: differential effects for gender of the observer.
        Front. Psychol. 2016; 7
        • Nunez-Smith M.
        • et al.
        Health care workplace discrimination and physician turnover.
        J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2009; 101: 1274-1282
        • Mello M.M.
        • Jagsi R.
        Standing up against gender Bias and harassment-a matter of professional ethics.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2020; 382: 1385
        • Silver J.K.
        Should her name begin with “Doctor”?.
        BMJ. 2020; 371: m4754
        • Gomez L.E.
        • Bernet P.
        Diversity improves performance and outcomes.
        J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2019; 111: 383-392
        • Cordova R.D.
        • Beaudin C.L.
        • Iwanabe K.E.
        Addressing diversity and moving toward equity in hospital care.
        Front. Health Serv. Manag. 2010; 26: 19-34
        • Brown A.
        • Bonneville G.
        • Glaze S.
        Nevertheless, they persisted: how women experience gender-based discrimination during postgraduate surgical training.
        Journal of Surgical Education. 2021; 78: 17-34
        • Hansen M.
        • et al.
        Implicit gender bias among US resident physicians.
        BMC Medical Education. 2019; 19: 396
        • Hu Y.-Y.
        • et al.
        Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2019; 381: 1741-1752
        • Pendleton A.A.
        • et al.
        A multi-institutional study of patient-derived gender-based discrimination experienced by resident physicians.
        Am. J. Surg. 2021; 221: 309-314
        • Barnes K.L.
        • et al.
        Gender Bias experiences of female surgical trainees.
        Journal of Surgical Education. 2019; 19: 87-92
        • Chang J.C.
        • Odrobina M.R.
        • McIntyre-Seltman K.
        The effect of student gender on the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship experience.
        J. Women’s Health. 2010; 19: 87-92
        • Hoops H.
        • et al.
        Resident autonomy in the operating room: does gender matter?.
        Am. J. Surg. 2019; 217: 301-305
        • Meyerson S.L.
        • et al.
        The effect of gender on operative autonomy in general surgery residents.
        Surgery. 2019; 166: 738-743
        • Gerull K.M.
        • et al.
        Assessing gender bias in qualitative evaluations of surgical residents.
        Am. J. Surg. 2019; 217: 306-313
        • Mueller A.S.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in attending physicians’ feedback to residents: a qualitative analysis.
        Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2017; 9: 577-585
        • Choo E.K.
        Damned if you do, damned if you don't: bias in evaluations of female resident physicians.
        Journal of graduate medical education. 2017; 9: 586-587
        • Correll S.
        • Simard C.
        Vague feedback is holding women back.
        Harv. Bus. Rev. 2016; 94: 2-5
        • Morgan H.K.
        • et al.
        Student evaluation of faculty physicians: gender differences in teaching evaluations.
        J. Women’s Health. 2016; 25: 453-456
        • Arah O.A.
        • Heineman M.J.
        • Lombarts K.M.
        Factors influencing residents’ evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status.
        Med. Educ. 2012; 46: 381-389
        • Burnell N.
        • Cojuharenco I.
        • Murad Z.
        Now you See it Now you don’t: The Effect of Teaching Style and Seniority on Gender bias in Teaching Evaluations.
        2018
        • Carnes M.
        • et al.
        Why is John more likely to become department chair than Jennifer?.
        Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 2015; 126: 197-214
        • Greenberg C.C.
        Association for Academic Surgery presidential address: sticky floors and glass ceilings.
        J. Surg. Res. 2017; 219: ix-xviii
        • Foote M.B.
        • et al.
        Use of “doctor” badges for physician role identification during clinical training.
        JAMA Intern. Med. 2019; 179: 1582-1584
        • Hutchison K.
        Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons and their cumulative impact.
        J. Med. Ethics. 2020; 46: 236-241
        • Linzer M.
        • Harwood E.
        Gendered expectations: do they contribute to high burnout among female physicians?.
        J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2018; 33: 963-965
        • Sarsons H.
        Interpreting Signals in the Labour Market: Evidence from Medical Referrals.
        Harvard University, 2017
        • Jones L.K.
        • et al.
        Ethological observations of social behavior in the operating room.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018; 115: 7575-7580
        • Dossett L.A.
        • et al.
        Women surgeons’ experiences of interprofessional workplace conflict.
        JAMA Netw. Open. 2020; 3: e2019843
        • Schachter A.E.
        • et al.
        Women support women, right? Gender disparities in decision-to-incision time in emergency surgery.
        J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2020; 231: S113-S114
        • Hofler L.G.
        • et al.
        Comparison of women in department leadership in obstetrics and gynecology with other specialties.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 127: 442
        • Hofler L.
        • et al.
        Subspecialty and gender of obstetrics and gynecology faculty in department-based leadership roles.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 125: 471
        • Hill E.K.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in scholarly productivity within academic gynecologic oncology departments.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 126: 1279
        • Salinaro J.R.
        • et al.
        Gender trends in gynecologic oncology authorship: implications for the critical evaluation of gender distribution in academic rank and leadership positions.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2018; 151: 542-546
        • Lewiss R.E.
        • et al.
        Is academic medicine making mid-career women physicians invisible?.
        J. Women’s Health. 2019; 29: 187-192
        • Jagsi R.
        • et al.
        The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature — a 35-year perspective.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 355: 281-287
        • Nguyen V.
        • et al.
        Academic Surgical oncologists’ Productivity Correlates with Gender, grant Funding, and Institutional NCI comprehensive cancer center Affiliation.
        Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018; 25: 1852-1859
        • Murrar S.
        • et al.
        Research conducted in women was deemed more impactful but less publishable than the same research conducted in men.
        J. Women’s Health. 2021; 30: 1259-1267
        • Oliveira D.F.M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators.
        JAMA. 2019; 321: 898-900
        • Lerchenmueller M.J.
        • Sorenson O.
        The gender gap in early career transitions in the life sciences.
        Res. Policy. 2018; 47: 1007-1017
        • Mirin A.A.
        Gender disparity in the funding of diseases by the US National Institutes of Health.
        J. Women’s Health. 2020; 30: 956-963
        • Rice L.W.
        • et al.
        Increasing NIH funding for academic departments of obstetrics and gynecology: a call to action.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 223: 79.e1-79.e8
        • Spencer R.J.
        • et al.
        Disparities in the allocation of research funding to gynecologic cancers by Funding to Lethality scores.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2019; 152: 106-111
        • Laver K.E.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of interventions to support the careers of women in academic medicine and other disciplines.
        BMJ Open. 2018; 8
        • Burgess A.
        • van Diggele C.
        • Mellis C.
        Mentorship in the health professions: a review.
        Clin. Teach. 2018; 15: 197-202
        • Sambunjak D.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Marušić A.
        Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 1103-1115
        • Rath K.S.
        • et al.
        Burnout and associated factors among members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 213 (p. 824. e1-824. e9)
        • Cass I.
        • et al.
        Stress and burnout among gynecologic oncologists: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology Evidence-based Review and Recommendations.
        Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2016; 71: 715-717
        • Johnson H.M.
        • et al.
        Associations between career satisfaction, personal life factors, and work-life integration practices among US surgeons by gender.
        JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155: 742-750
        • Jolly S.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers.
        Ann. Intern. Med. 2014; 160: 344-353
        • Fassiotto M.
        • et al.
        An integrated career coaching and time-banking system promoting flexibility, wellness, and success: a pilot program at Stanford University School of Medicine.
        Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2018; 93: 881-887
        • Hill E.K.
        • et al.
        Gender and the balance of parenting and professional life among gynecology subspecialists.
        J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26: 1088-1094
        • Hariton E.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy and parental leave among obstetrics and gynecology residents: results of a nationwide survey of program directors.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 219: 199.e1-199.e8
        • Juengst S.B.
        • et al.
        Family leave and return-to-work experiences of physician mothers.
        JAMA Netw. Open. 2019; 2: e1913054
        • Lumpkin S.T.
        • et al.
        Fellowship or family? A comparison of residency leave policies with the family and medical leave act.
        J. Surg. Res. 2019; 241: 302-307
        • Melnitchouk N.
        • Scully R.E.
        • Davids J.S.
        Barriers to breastfeeding for US physicians who are mothers.
        JAMA Intern. Med. 2018; 178: 1130-1132
        • Smith V.
        • Bethune C.
        • Hurley K.F.
        Examining medical student specialty choice through a gender lens: an orientational qualitative study.
        Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2018; 30: 33-44
        • Jena A.B.
        • Olenski A.R.
        • Blumenthal D.M.
        Sex differences in physician salary in US public medical schools.
        JAMA Intern. Med. 2016; 176: 1294-1304
        • Pelley E.
        • Carnes M.
        When a specialty becomes “women’s work”: trends in and implications of specialty gender segregation in medicine.
        Acad. Med. 2020; 95: 1499-1506
        • Butkus R.
        • et al.
        Achieving gender equity in physician compensation and career advancement: a position paper of the American College of Physicians.
        Ann. Intern. Med. 2018; 168: 721-723
        • Benoit M.F.
        • Ma J.F.
        • Upperman B.A.
        Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth?.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2017; 144: 336-342
        • Watson K.L.
        • King L.P.
        Double discrimination, the pay gap in gynecologic surgery, and its association with quality of care.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 137: 657-661
        • Hegewisch A.
        • Hartmann H.
        Occupational Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap: A Job Half Done.
        2014
        • Kane L.
        Medscape Physician Compensation Report 2021: The Recovery Begins.
        ([cited 2021 May 16]; Available from:)
        • Westring A.F.
        • et al.
        A culture conducive to women’s academic success: development of a measure.
        Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2012; 87: 1622
        • Morgan A.U.
        • et al.
        Eliminating gender-based Bias in academic medicine: more than naming the “elephant in the room”.
        J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2018; 33: 966-968
        • Bates C.
        • et al.
        Striving for gender equity in academic medicine careers: a call to action.
        Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2016; 91: 1050-1052
        • Hayes S.N.
        • Noseworthy J.H.
        • Farrugia G.
        A structured compensation plan results in equitable physician compensation: a single-center analysis.
        in: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Elsevier, 2020
        • Beeler W.H.
        • Mangurian C.
        • Jagsi R.
        Unplugging the pipeline — a call for term limits in academic medicine.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2019; 381: 1508-1511
        • Helitzer D.L.
        • et al.
        Changing the culture of academic medicine: critical mass or critical actors?.
        J. Women’s Health. 2017; 26: 540-548