Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 163, ISSUE 1, P162-170, October 2021

Download started.

Ok

Platinum resistance in gynecologic malignancies: Response, disease free and overall survival are predicted by biochemical signature: A metabolomic analysis

  • Paulo D'Amora
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Molecular Gynecology and Metabolomics Lab, Gynecology Department, College of Medicine of the Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), Rua Pedro de Toledo, 781 – 4o. andar – frente, CEP 04039-032 São Paulo, Brazil.
    Affiliations
    Molecular Gynecology and Metabolomics Lab, Gynecology Department, College of Medicine of the Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), Rua Pedro de Toledo, 781 - 4o. andar frente, 04039-032 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Nagourney Cancer Institute, 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA

    Metabolomycs, Inc., 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ismael Dale C.G. Silva
    Affiliations
    Molecular Gynecology and Metabolomics Lab, Gynecology Department, College of Medicine of the Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), Rua Pedro de Toledo, 781 - 4o. andar frente, 04039-032 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Metabolomycs, Inc., 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Krishnansu S. Tewari
    Affiliations
    Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Todd Cancer Institute, 2810 Long Beach Blvd, Long Beach 90806, CA, USA

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Medicine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange 92868, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robert E. Bristow
    Affiliations
    Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Todd Cancer Institute, 2810 Long Beach Blvd, Long Beach 90806, CA, USA

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Medicine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange 92868, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Fabio Cappuccini
    Affiliations
    Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Todd Cancer Institute, 2810 Long Beach Blvd, Long Beach 90806, CA, USA

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Medicine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange 92868, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Steven S. Evans
    Affiliations
    Nagourney Cancer Institute, 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA

    Metabolomycs, Inc., 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Marcia B. Salzgeber
    Affiliations
    Molecular Gynecology and Metabolomics Lab, Gynecology Department, College of Medicine of the Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), Rua Pedro de Toledo, 781 - 4o. andar frente, 04039-032 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Paula J. Addis-Bernard
    Affiliations
    Nagourney Cancer Institute, 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Anton M. Palma
    Affiliations
    Institute for Clinical and Translational Science (ICTS), University of California Irvine (UCI), 843 Health Science Rd, Irvine 92697, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dirce M.L. Marchioni
    Affiliations
    Nutrition Department, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo School of Medicine (FMUSP), Av. Dr Arnaldo 715, 01246-904 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Antonio A.F. Carioca
    Affiliations
    Nutrition Department, University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR), Av. Washington Soares, 1321, 60811-905 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kristine R. Penner
    Affiliations
    Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, 25825 S Vermont Ave, Harbor City 90710, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jill Alldredge
    Affiliations
    UCHealth Cancer Care - Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, 1665 Aurora Court, Aurora 80045, CO, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Teresa Longoria
    Affiliations
    Scripps Clinic John R. Anderson V Medical Pavilion, 9898 Genesee Ave, La Jolla 92037, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robert A. Nagourney
    Affiliations
    Nagourney Cancer Institute, 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA

    Metabolomycs, Inc., 750 East 29th Street, 90806 Long Beach, CA, USA

    Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Todd Cancer Institute, 2810 Long Beach Blvd, Long Beach 90806, CA, USA

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Medicine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange 92868, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Open AccessPublished:August 24, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.001

      Highlights

      • Platinum resistance in gynecologic cancer correlates with metabolic signatures measured by quantitative mass spectrometry.
      • Metabolic signatures predict clinical outcome following carboplatin plus Paclitaxel chemotherapy.
      • Altered amino acid and lipid profiles characterize a state of tumor cellular quiescence associated with immune dysfunction.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Platinum resistance, defined as the lack of response or relapse within six months of platinum-based chemotherapy, is an important determinant of survival in gynecologic cancer. We used quantitative Mass Spectrometry to identify metabolic signatures that predict platinum resistance in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic cancers.

      Methods

      In this study 47 patients with adenocarcinoma of the ovary or uterus who were candidates for carboplatin plus paclitaxel submitted blood for quantitation of metabolites and surgical specimens for the isolation 3-dimensional organoids used to measure individual patient platinum resistance, ex vivo. Results were correlated with response, time to progression and survival.

      Results

      Of 47 patients, 27 (64.3%) achieved complete remission with a mean time to progression of 1.9 years (± 1.5), disease-free survival of 1.7 years (± 1.4) and overall survival of 2.6 years (± 1.6) and a mean cisplatin lethal concentration 50% (LC50) = 1.15 μg/ml (range 0.4–3.1). Cisplatin LC50's correlated with a non-significant decrease in complete remission (RR [95% CI] =0.76 [0.46–1.27]), diminished disease-free survival (median: 1.15 vs. 2.99 years, p = 0.038) and with biochemical signatures of 186 metabolites. Receiver operating curves (ROC) of lipid ratios, branched chain amino acids and the tryptophan to kynurenine ratio identified patients at the highest risk of relapse and death (AUC = 0.933) with a sensitivity of 92.0% and specificity of 86.0% (p < 0.001).

      Conclusions

      Metabolic signatures in gynecologic cancer identify patients at the highest risk of relapse and death offering new diagnostic and prognostic tools for management of the advanced gynecologic tumors.

      Graphical abstract

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      Of the over 117,000 new gynecologic cancers diagnosed in the US annually, adenocarcinomas of the ovary and uterus are the most common. With 21,750 new diagnoses and 13,900 deaths, ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from female reproductive system cancer followed closely by endometrial cancer with 65,620 new cases and 12,520 deaths [
      • Hussain I.
      • Xu J.
      • Deng K.
      • Noor-Ul-Amin
      • Wang C.
      • Huang Y.
      • Li S.
      • Li K.
      The prevalence and associated factors for liver metastases, development and prognosis in newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer: a large population-based study from the SEER database.
      ].
      Total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy with optimal de-bulking is the most important determinant of long-term survival in ovarian [
      • Bristow R.E.
      • Tomacruz R.S.
      • Armstrong D.K.
      • Trimble E.L.
      • Montz F.J.
      Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis.
      ] and uterine cancer [
      • Memarzadeh S.
      • Holschneider C.H.
      • Bristow R.E.
      • et al.
      FIGO stage III and IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma: impact of residual disease on survival.
      ]. Patients with advanced ovarian and endometrial cancers of adequate performance status receive postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy. After the introduction of cisplatin (CDDP) plus paclitaxel [
      • McGuire W.P.
      • Hoskins W.J.
      • Brady M.F.
      • Kucera P.R.
      • Partridge E.E.
      • Look K.Y.
      • Clarke-Pearson D.L.
      • Davidson M.
      Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer.
      ], carboplatin plus paclitaxel became the gold standard of treatment for ovarian and endometrial cancer [
      • Sovak M.A.
      • Dupont J.
      • Hensley M.L.
      • Ishill N.
      • Gerst S.
      • Abu-Rustum N.
      • Anderson S.
      • Barakat R.
      • Konner J.
      • Poyner E.
      • Sabbatini P.
      • Spriggs D.R.
      • Aghajanian C.
      Paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a large retrospective study.
      ].
      Over 80% of ovarian and 60% of endometrial cancer patients initially respond to platinum-based chemotherapy, but the majority relapse. The term “platinum-resistant” [
      • Markman M.
      • Rothman R.
      • Hakes T.
      • Reichman B.
      • Hoskins W.
      • Rubin S.
      • Jones W.
      • Almadrones L.
      • Lewis Jr., J.L.
      Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.
      ] refers to patients with ovarian cancer who progress within six months of platinum-based therapy and identifies those at the highest risk for disease related mortality. “Platinum resistance” applied to endometrial cancer has also been found significantly associated with progression free and overall survival (P < 0.0001) [
      • Nagao S.
      • Nishio S.
      • Michimae H.
      • Tanabe H.
      • Okada S.
      • Otsuki T.
      • Tanioka M.
      • Fujiwara K.
      • Suzuki M.
      • Kigawa J.
      Applicability of the concept of “platinum sensitivity” to recurrent endometrial cancer: the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study.
      ].
      The critical role of platinum in the management of gynecologic malignancies has led to intensive research into the cellular mechanisms of platinum resistance including drug uptake, neutralization by intracellular thiols and DNA repair [
      • Muggia F.
      Platinum compounds 30 years after the introduction of cisplatin: implications for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
      ].
      Since the 1980s platinum adduct repair by nucleotide excision ERCC1 (excision repair cross-complementation group) and mismatch repair have been a major focus of research [
      • Bowden N.A.
      Nucleotide excision repair: why is it not used to predict response to platinum-based chemotherapy?.
      ]. More recently small interfering RNA HOTAIR (HOX transcript antisense intergenic RNA discovered by transcript profiling) has been examined [
      • Hansson J.
      • Wood R.D.
      Repair synthesis by human cell extracts in DNA damaged by cis- and trans-diamminedichloroplatinum (II).
      ,
      • Hansson J.
      • Grossman L.
      • Lindahl T.
      • Wood R.D.
      Complementation of the xeroderma pigmentosum DNA repair synthesis defect with Escherichia coli UvrABC proteins in a cell-free system.
      ].
      The growing recognition that malignant transformation is associated with alterations in cellular bioenergetics has led to a renewed interest in the study of cancer metabolism. To examine the metabolic basis of platinum resistance, we conducted a prospective study of patients with advanced ovarian and endometrial cancer who received post-operative carboplatin plus paclitaxel following cytoreductive surgery and applied targeted mass spectrometry to assess the correlation between biochemical signatures, platinum resistance measured ex vivo and patient response and survival.

      2. Materials and methods

      2.1 Patients and study procedures

      Patients referred to the Gynecology Oncology Service of the University of California, Irvine Long Beach Memorial Medical Center with advanced intraabdominal/pelvic malignancy between August 2013 and July 2018 were screened for eligibility. Of 51 patients who underwent surgical exploration during this period, 39 had advanced stage ovarian, 7 had uterine and 1 had both ovarian and uterine cancer. Four patients were found to have unrelated malignancies and were excluded from this study: appendiceal pseudo myxoma peritonei (n = 1), colon carcinoma (n = 1), and squamous cancer of the cervix (n = 2). The remaining 47 patients were evaluable for ex vivo platinum sensitivity and metabolomic analysis. A total of 31 healthy post-menopausal women ages 54–78 years (mean = 66) with no history of ovarian cancer with normal physical exam, ultrasound, mammogram, and biochemical findings served as controls.
      Prior to surgery, eligible patients signed informed consent for the collection of tumor tissue and peripheral venous blood samples for metabolomic analysis at the time of surgery and clinical follow up. Tumor specimens were collected from the Department of Pathology and transferred to the laboratory within 30 min following surgery, in RPMI and immediately processed. Blood samples were collected in ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes, and immediately centrifuged (5 min at 4000 rpm). Plasma samples were aliquoted, frozen, and stored at −80 °C for analysis. All 47 patients had both tissue culture and blood metabolic analyses conducted in parallel.
      After recovery from surgery, all patients with adequate white count, hemoglobin, and platelet count and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 received carboplatin plus paclitaxel with an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 or 6 and a paclitaxel dose of 135 mg/m2 or 175 mg/m2, depending on performance status and tolerance [
      • Calvert A.H.
      • Newell D.R.
      • Gumbrell L.A.
      • O’Reilly S.
      • Burnell M.
      • Boxall F.E.
      • Siddik Z.H.
      • Judson I.R.
      • Gore M.E.
      • Wiltshaw E.
      Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.
      ]. All patients were followed through the course of treatment and monitored every three months by CA-125, CT scan, MRI, or PET/CT, depending upon the clinical determination of the treating physicians.

      2.2 Demographic and clinical data

      Patient demographics and baseline health characteristics were extracted from medical records. These included age at time of surgery, clinical stage (I-IV) at baseline, and receipt of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with measurable disease, clinical response was assessed by RECIST criteria [
      • Eisenhauer E.A.
      • Therasse P.
      • Bogaerts J.
      • Schwartz L.H.
      • Sargent D.
      • Ford R.
      • Dancey J.
      • Arbuck S.
      • Gwyther S.
      • Mooney M.
      • Rubinstein L.
      • Shankar L.
      • Dodd L.
      • Kaplan R.
      • Lacombe D.
      • Verweij J.
      New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
      ]. Patients optimally debulked and rendered free of measurable disease at the time of surgery were followed for evidence of clinical recurrence.
      Overall survival was measured as the number of months from the date of surgery until death or last contact. Progression-free survival was measured as the number of months from date of surgery until clinical progression, death, or end of follow-up.
      The study was approved by Memorial Care Health System Institutional Review Board (project # 292-13) under the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, and the Institutional Review Board of São Paulo Hospital (CEP/UNIFESP) from the Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (approval # CAAE 40652915.2.0000.5505).

      2.3 Ex vivo analysis of drug response

      To develop a metric of individual patient platinum resistance, tissue culture studies were conducted by ex vivo analysis of programmed cell death (EVA-PCD), a short-term suspension culture method that examines the morphologic and metabolic features of drug-induced programmed cell death in primary culture. The EVA-PCD laboratory method has previously been described [
      • Nagourney R.A.
      • Sommers B.L.
      • Harper S.M.
      • Radecki S.
      • Evans S.S.
      Ex vivo analysis of topotecan: advancing the application of laboratory-based clinical therapeutics.
      ,
      • Nagourney R.A.
      • Brewer C.A.
      • Radecki S.
      • Kidder W.A.
      • Sommers B.L.
      • Evans S.S.
      • Minor D.R.
      • DiSaia P.J.
      Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin repeating doublet therapy in previously treated, relapsed ovarian cancer patients.
      ].
      Briefly, surgical specimens were mechanically and enzymatically dis-aggregated in 0.2% (w/v) DNAse and 0.4% (w/v) Collagenase IV. Tumor clusters of desired size were isolated by density centrifugation. Cell counts were adjusted by dilution and distributed into 96-well plates. Serial dilutions of Cisplatin were added by micropipette. Tumor cell/drug mixtures were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
      After drug exposure, air dried slides were counterstained with H & E with percent viability measured against saline-exposed controls (normalized to 100%). Five-point dose response curves were interpolated to calculate platinum sensitivity as the lethal concentration of CDDP required to kill 50% of tumor cells (LC50 CDDP). Due to the highly right-skewed distribution, LC50 CDDP was log-transformed or dichotomized above vs. below the median (0.9 μg/mL) as ex vivo platinum resistant vs. sensitive in analyses.

      2.4 Clinical outcome analyses

      We conducted time-to-event analyses to explore whether ex vivo platinum sensitivity was associated with time to disease progression, disease-free-survival, and overall survival using Kaplan-Meier tables and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, adjusted for age, clinical stage, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All analyses on clinical outcomes were conducted both in the full sample of n = 47 participants and replicated among patients with high grade serous cancers only (n = 30) as a sensitivity analysis. A second time to event analysis explored whether the metabolomic signature define as
      Val/Phe/C18:2/lysoPCaC16:0/Tryptophanwas associatedwith time to progression,disease free and overall survival.


      2.5 Targeted quantitative MS/MS analysis

      Absolute quantification (μmol/L) of blood metabolites was achieved by targeted quantitative profiling of 186 annotated metabolites by electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in each patient's biological samples, blinded to any clinical information, on a centralized, independent, fee-for-service basis at the quantitative metabolomics platform from BIOCRATES Life Sciences AG, Innsbruck, Austria. In brief, the measurement technique consisted of a targeted profiling scheme used to quantitatively screen for fully annotated metabolites using multiple reaction monitoring, neutral loss, and precursor ion scans. Quantification of metabolite concentrations and quality control assessment was performed with the MetIQ software package (BIOCRATES Life Sciences AG, Innsbruck, Austria), yielding sample identification and plasma concentrations (μmol/L) of each metabolite.

      2.6 Metabolite panel

      The metabolite panel comprised 40 Acylcarnitines (ACs), 21 Amino Acids (AAs), 19 Biogenic Amines (BA), sum of Hexoses (Hex), 76 Phosphatidylcholines (PCs), 14 Lysophosphatidylcholines (LPCs) and 15 Sphingomyelins (SMs), Glycerophospholipids were further differentiated with respect to the presence of Ester (a) and Ether (e) bonds in the Glycerol moiety, where two letters denote that two Glycerol positions are bound to a fatty acid residue (aa = diacyl, ae = acyl-alkyl), while a single letter indicates the presence of a single fatty acid residue (a = acyl or e = alkyl). In addition, the metabolite panel included the following energy metabolism components (TCA intermediates): Glucose, Ribose, 2-Hydroxyglutaric Acid, Alpha-Ketoglutaric Acid, Fumaric Acid, Malic Acid, Succinic Acid, 2-Hydroxybutyric Acid, 3-Hydroxybutyric Acid, Lactic Acid, Pyruvic Acid, Citric Acid, and Isocitric Acid.

      2.7 Metabolomic analysis and validation tests

      For metabolomic data analysis, log-transformation was applied to all quantified metabolites to normalize the concentration distributions and uploaded into the web-based analytical pipelines MetaboAnalyst 3.0 for the generation of uni- and multivariate Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves obtained through Support Vector Machine (SVM), Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Random Forests as well as Logistic Regression Models to calculate Odds Ratios of specific metabolites [
      • Xia J.
      • Wishart D.S.
      Web-based inference of biological patterns, functions, and pathways from metabolomic data using MetaboAnalyst.
      ,
      • Xia J.
      • Wishart D.S.
      MSEA: a web-based tool to identify biologically meaningful patterns in quantitative metabolomic data.
      ].
      ROC curves were generated by Monte-Carlo Cross Validation (MCCV) using balanced sub-sampling where two-thirds of the samples were used to evaluate the feature importance. Significant features were then used to build classification models, which were validated on the remaining third of the samples. The same procedure was repeated 10–100 times to calculate the performance and confidence interval of each model.
      To further validate the statistical significance of each model, ROC calculations included bootstrap 95% confidence intervals for the desired model specificity and accuracy after 1000 permutations and false discovery rates (FDR) calculation [
      • Xia J.
      • Wishart D.S.
      Web-based inference of biological patterns, functions, and pathways from metabolomic data using MetaboAnalyst.
      ,
      • Xia J.
      • Wishart D.S.
      MSEA: a web-based tool to identify biologically meaningful patterns in quantitative metabolomic data.
      ].
      The AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit includes quality control (QC) samples that are pipetted onto each measurement plate in order to allow harmonization of large datasets and comparability of results between batches. These QC samples are plasma-based reference samples with the exact same composition in every aliquot that are used to normalize all data, allowing a greater degree of precision across larger studies and minimizing batch effects. QC-based normalization was conducted for every measurement plate using Biocrates' software Met IDQ.

      3. Results

      Forty-seven patients with ovarian and/or uterine cancers met eligibility criteria for this analysis, 30 (64%) of whom were classified as having high-grade serous cancers (Table 1). Participant age ranged from 32 to 83 years with mean (± standard error [SE]) age 62.3 ± 12 years. The majority had ovarian cancer and were clinical stage III or IV at the time of surgery. Twenty-seven (64.3%) achieved complete remission after initial treatment but there was wide variability in time to progression, and disease-free and overall survival (Table 1); mean time to progression was 1.9 years (±1.5), disease-free survival was 1.7 years (±1.4), and overall survival was 2.6 years (±1.6). Based on EVA-PCD testing, mean LC50 CDDP was 1.15 (range 0.4–3.1).
      Table 1Study group characteristics.
      VariableCategory**Overall (n = 47)Ovarian high grade serous only (n = 30)Healthy controls (n = 31)Healthy controls (n = 76)
      n (%) or mean ± SD (range)n (%) or mean ± SD (range)n (%) or mean ± SD (range)n (%) or mean ± SD (range)
      Total47 (100)30 (100)31 (100)76 (100)
      Age years65.3 ± 12 (35–87)66 ± 12 (54–78)50.7 ± 12 (20–89)
      DiagnosisOvary39 (83)30 (100)Healthy Menopausal WomenHealthy Female Volunteers
      Uterine7 (14.9)0 (0)
      *Ovary with Uterine1 (2.1)0 (0)
      FIGO stageI7 (15.2)1 (3.3)n/an/a
      II8 (17.4)4 (13.3)
      III21 (45.7)16 (53.3)
      IV10 (21.7)9 (30.0)
      Histological typesOvarian Serous Adenocarcinoma30 (63)
      Ovarian Mucinous Adenocarcinoma2 (4.2)
      Ovarian Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma1 (2.1)
      Ovarian Borderline Tumor4 (8.5)
      Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma1 (2.1)
      Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumor1 (2.1)
      Endometrial Adenocarcinoma4 (8.5)
      Endometrial Serous Carcinoma2 (4.2)
      Uterine Leiomyosarcoma2 (4.2)
      Neoadjuvant chemo (yes/no)13 (27.7)13 (43.3)n/an/a
      Adjuvant chemo (yes/no)36 (76.6)25 (83.3)
      Treatment responseComplete remission27 (64.3)17 (65.4)n/an/a
      Partial remission1 (2.4)1 (3.8)
      Progressed disease14 (33.3)8 (30.8)
      Platinum sensitive (LC50 CDDP high vs. low)20 (60.6)16 (66.7)n/an/a
      Clinical Platinum Resistance (DFS)DFS < 180 days (resistant)8 (17)6 (21)
      DFS > 180 days (sensitive)38 (83)23 (79)
      Time to progression (years)1.8 ± 1.3 (0.1–4.5)1.7 ± 1.2 (0.1–4.5)
      Disease-free survival (years)1.6 ± 1.2 (0.1–4.5)1.5 ± 1.2 (0.1–4.5)
      Overall survival (years)2.3 ± 1.3 (0.1–6.7)2.3 ± 1.3 (0.1–5.1)
      Recurrent Disease (yes/no)28 (62.2)21 (75.0)
      Footnote - FIGO = staging according to classification by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; n/a = not applicable;*Ovary with Uterine = subject with concurrent ovary and uterine cancers; **Overall = Total cohort consists of 39 ovarian cancer, 6 endometrial and 2 uterine sarcomas (30 ovarian serous; 2 ovarian mucinous; 1 ovarian endometrioid; 4 ovarian borderlines; 1 ovarian clear cell; 1 ovarian granulosa; 4 endometrial adenocarcinomas; 2 endometrial serous and 2 uterine leiomyosarcoma).
      Kaplan-Meier plots for time to progression, disease-free survival, and overall survival by ex vivo platinum resistance vs. sensitivity (LC50 CDDP dichotomized above vs. below the median 0.9 μg/mL) and metabolomic signature are shown in Fig. 1 A-F. Results indicate that those with ex vivo platinum resistance (high LC50 CDDP) have shorter median time to progression (1.30 vs. 1.86 years, p = 0.071), disease-free survival (1.15 vs. 2.99, p = 0.038) and overall survival (median not observed for ex vivo platinum resistant group, p = 0.097); however, only the differences in disease-free survival were statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier plots for time to progression, disease-free survival, and overall survival by metabolic signature resistant vs. sensitive (dichotomize above vs. below the median of 60 units, indicate that those with a resistant metabolic signature greater than 60 have shorter median time to progression (1.3 vs. 2.99 years, p = 0.03), disease-free survival (p = 0.024) and overall survival. Findings did not notably change when analyses were restricted to the high-grade serous cancers only (Supplemental Fig. 1A-F). Results from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical stage (where possible), showed similar patterns for each outcome by platinum resistance and metabolic signature but none of the results were statistically significant (Table 2).
      Fig. 2 shows a heatmap of the results of the unsupervised quantitative multivariate analysis applied to a training set to identify the 60 most discriminating biochemical parameters (indicated by black arrows). As cryopreserved samples for metabolic study were conducted by batch, the first 13 specimens served as the “training set” followed by the full 47 samples used in the “validation set”. Results were confirmed in a validation set (power = 0.8). Findings include elevations of short and long chain acylcarnitines and a decrease in structural lipids, specifically phosphatidyl cholines and sphingomyelins compared with controls (Fig. 2).
      Fig. 1
      Fig. 1(A--F). Kaplan-Meier curves of time to progression, disease-free survival, and overall survival by LC50 CDDP (A--C) and metabolic signature (D--F).
      Table 2Cox proportional hazards model for time to progression. Overall (n = 47). The Cox model was used for analysis of survival data with and without censoring, for identifying differences in survival due to treatment and prognostic factors. The Cox regression model for survival data provides an estimate of the hazard ratio and its confidence interval.
      Table thumbnail t1
      Fig. 2
      Fig. 2Heatmap with unsupervised quantitative multivariate analysis applied to training set reveals that ovary cancer patients exhibit systemic biochemical changes suggestive of disorders in mitochondrial function. Controls and ovary cancer groups were discriminated with the 60 most discriminating biochemical parameters described.
      We examined the relationship between clinical platinum resistance, defined as relapse within 6 months of platinum-based chemotherapy, and laboratory CDDP resistance defined as LC50 falling above the median value 0.9 μg/ml. Results indicate a strong trend with a 2 fold higher likelihood of relapse within 6 months of platinum based chemotherapy for patients' with a CDDP falling above the median value LC50 > 0.9 μg/ml that, due to limited sample size, did not achieve significance (χ2 test, P = 0.259).
      Fig. 3 provides Pearson Moment correlation coefficients (R-values) as Z-scores distributed around the mean that compare CDDP resistance (LC50) with the described metabolites and with disease-free-survival (DFS).A broad array of lipid species, specifically lysophosphatidyl cholines associated with inflammation, track with CDDP resistance (LC50) while DFS tracks in the opposite direction along with the amino acids Phe and Met, linoleic acid (C18:2) and Sphingomyelin (SM C20:2) which have been correlated with altered metabolism [
      • Allalou A.
      • Nalla A.
      • Prentice K.J.
      • Liu Y.
      • Zhang M.
      • Dai F.F.
      • Ning X.
      • Osborne L.R.
      • Cox B.J.
      • Gunderson E.P.
      • Wheeler M.B.
      A predictive metabolic signature for the transition from gestational diabetes mellitus to type 2 diabetes.
      ].
      Fig. 3
      Fig. 3Correlation coefficients comparing CDDP resistance (LC50) measured ex vivo with the described metabolites measured in plasma and disease-free-survival (DFS).
      Fig. 4
      Fig. 4(A, B). Multivariate ROC curve analysis depicting the performance of a biochemical equation in detecting platinum resistant patients. The ratio takes into consideration metabolites related to liver function (Val/Phe), lipid metabolism (C18:0/lyso PC C16:0) and Immunity (Tryptophan) and compares the results with the CDDP LC50 values, generated ex vivo.
      A second analysis using a combination of liver function related metabolites, valine, and phenylalanine (Val/Phe), combined with the previously described acylcarnitine/lyso-phosphatidyl choline C18:2/LysoPC ratio together with the immune related tryptophan ratio provides a highly discriminating ROC that identifies CDDP resistance in the blood with an AUC = 0.933 (P = 1.24 e-6), a sensitivity of 0.92, and specificity of 0.86 (Fig. 4A-B). The Valine/Phenylalanine ratio reflects Fisher's quotient [
      • Fischer J.E.
      • Rosen H.M.
      • Ebeid A.M.
      • James J.H.
      • Keane J.M.
      • Soeters P.B.
      The effect of normalization of plasma amino acids on hepatic encephalopathy in man.
      ] an established measure of liver health and function, that we previously applied in a metabolomic analysis of breast cancer [
      • da Silva I.
      • da Costa Vieira R.
      • Stella C.
      • Loturco E.
      • Carvalho A.L.
      • Veo C.
      • Neto C.
      • Silva S.M.
      • D’Amora P.
      • Salzgeber M.
      • Matos D.
      • Silva C.R.
      • Oliveira J.R.
      • Rabelo I.
      • Yamakawa P.
      • Maciel R.
      • Biscolla R.
      • Chiamolera M.
      • Fraietta R.
      • Reis F.
      • Mori M.
      • Marchioni D.
      • Carioca A.
      • Maciel G.
      • Tomioka R.
      • Baracat E.
      • Silva C.
      • Granato C.
      • Diaz R.
      • Scarpellini B.
      • Egle D.
      • Fiegl H.
      • Himmel I.
      • Troi C.
      • Nagourney R.
      Inborn-like errors of metabolism are determinants of breast cancer risk, clinical response and survival: a study of human biochemical individuality.
      ] while the lipid and Tryptophan ratios reflect altered bio-energetic and immune signatures. The analyses that examined specific lipid species and ratios with a focus upon acyl-carnitines, phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelins that were used to define the shift in mitochondrial function from structural lipids to inflammation and energy production are provided in Supplementary Figs. 1 (A-G; I, J); 2 (A-F); and 3 (D). The described alterations in amino acid concentrations that are reflective of liver dysfunction are provided in Supplementary Fig. 3 (A-C, E, J, K) while immune dysfunction is reflected in levels of tryptophan metabolites Supplementary Fig. 3 (A, F).

      4. Discussion

      As platinum resistance in advanced gynecologic malignancies is a principal determinant of survival [
      • Markman M.
      • Rothman R.
      • Hakes T.
      • Reichman B.
      • Hoskins W.
      • Rubin S.
      • Jones W.
      • Almadrones L.
      • Lewis Jr., J.L.
      Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.
      ], there is a pressing need to explore the biological basis of this phenomenon.
      The capacity to identify platinum-resistance using laboratory measures at the time of diagnosis could have important implications for the choice and intensity of therapy. Among the approaches that have been applied are tissue culture techniques to measure relative drug responsiveness [
      • Black M.M.
      • Speer F.D.
      Further observations on the effects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents on the in vitro dehydrogenase activity of cancer tissue.
      ,
      • Salmon S.E.
      • Hamburger A.W.
      • Soehnlen B.
      • Durie B.G.
      • Alberts D.S.
      • Moon T.E.
      Quantitation of differential sensitivity of human-tumor stem cells to anticancer drugs.
      ]. With the description of apoptosis [
      • Kerr J.F.
      • Wyllie A.H.
      • Currie A.R.
      Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics.
      ] laboratory methods that measure drug-induced cell death have been applied for the prediction of response to chemotherapy in a variety of cancers [
      • Nagourney R.A.
      Ex vivo programmed cell death and the prediction of response to chemotherapy.
      ,
      • Nagourney R.A.
      • Blitzer J.B.
      • Shuman R.L.
      • et al.
      Functional profiling to select chemotherapy in untreated, advanced, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
      ].
      The recognition that cancer arises in a state of altered metabolism has led to a renewed interest in the biochemical basis of malignant transformation and the capacity of cancer cells to resist therapeutic intervention. [
      • Hanahan D.
      • Weinberg R.A.
      Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.
      ].
      The current study correlated individual patient cisplatin resistance measured ex vivo with clinical outcomes and metabolic signatures in patients with advanced gynecologic carcinomas who received carboplatin plus paclitaxel as post-operative treatment.
      We chose cisplatin based on its critical role in gynecologic malignancies. Prior studies that compared single agent carboplatin or cisplatin with multi-drug combinations established platinum's primacy as a determinant of outcome [
      ICON Collaborators. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Study
      ICON2: randomised trial of single-agent carboplatin against three-drug combination of CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in women with ovarian cancer.
      ,
      International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group
      Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 2003 Feb 22;361(9358):706].
      ,
      • Muggia F.M.
      • Braly P.S.
      • Brady M.F.
      • et al.
      Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.
      ,
      • Rose P.G.
      • Mossbruger K.
      • Fusco N.
      • Smrekar M.
      • Eaton S.
      • Rodriguez M.
      Gemcitabine reverses cisplatin resistance: demonstration of activity in platinum- and multidrug-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma.
      ,
      • Safra T.
      • Asna N.
      • Veizman A.
      • et al.
      The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin shows similar efficacy in the treatment of platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
      ].
      To interrogate the biochemical basis of platinum resistance in gynecologic tumors we examined metabolic signatures in plasma obtained from patients prior to surgery and chemotherapy. This provided the opportunity to correlate response, disease free and overall survival, and platinum resistance with 186 metabolites quantified using targeted mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The findings suggest that chemotherapy response and survival in advanced gynecologic malignancies may reflect individual patient metabolic abnormalities associated with liver dysfunction (Val/Phe), altered lipid metabolism (18:2/LysoPC) and immune dysfunction (TRP/Kyn). We show that these metabolic aberrancies can be identified and quantified in patients prior to therapy via blood testing.
      Among the findings are disturbances in branched chain amino acids (BCAA) reminiscent of Hartnup's disease, an inborn error of metabolism associated with BCAA malabsorption that can extend to Citrulline, a non-proteinogenic amino acid synthesized in the small intestine. Additional evidence of intestinal malabsorption is reflected by lower levels of essential fatty acids like linoleic as measured by lysophatidylcholine (C18:2).
      Lower citrulline levels could also reflect urea cycle dysregulation, particularly, ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency [

      Lichter-Konecki U, Caldovic L, Morizono H, Simpson K. Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency. 2013 Aug 29 [updated 2016 Apr 14]. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Mirzaa G, Amemiya A. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2021. (PMID: 24006547).

      ]. The increased ornithine to citrulline (Orn/Cit) ratio further supports urea cycle dysregulation as described previously in other cancers [
      • Lee J.S.
      • Adler L.
      • Karathia H.
      • et al.
      Urea cycle dysregulation generates clinically relevant genomic and biochemical signatures.
      ].
      The non-proteinogenic amino acid kynurenine, identified in patient's plasma, is the byproduct of tryptophan catabolism by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase 2 (TDO2). The ratio of kynurenine to tryptophan (Kyn/Trp) reflects activation of these pathways that are known to diminish T-cell function and are found up-regulated in many human malignancies [
      • Smith L.P.
      • Bitler B.G.
      • Richer J.K.
      • Christenson J.L.
      Tryptophan catabolism in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
      ].
      The elevated ratio (C18:2/lysoPC a C18:0) suggests that cancer patients shift their metabolism of free fatty acids toward the synthesis of acylcarnitines (C18:2) at the expense of structural lipids (lysoPC a C18:0). As we show, higher values of this ratio are associated with the highest levels of resistance to cisplatin. This ratio also segregates cancer cases from controls in both the training and validation sets. The specific lipidomic results that characterize platinum resistance (as LC50 values) are provided in Supplementary Figs. 1 (A-G, I, J) and 2 (A-F). Similar results in some of the controls suggest that platinum sensitivity could be an inborn biochemical characteristic.
      Prior metabolomic analyses in ovarian cancer have correlated alterations in amino acids, phospholipids, acylcarnitines and other metabolic intermediates with clinical outcomes [
      • Plewa S.
      • Horała A.
      • Dereziński P.
      • Nowak-Markwitz E.
      • Matysiak J.
      • Kokot Z.J.
      Wide spectrum targeted metabolomics identifies potential ovarian cancer biomarkers.
      ,
      • Zhang F.
      • Zhang Y.
      • Ke C.
      • Li A.
      • Wang W.
      • Yang K.
      • Liu H.
      • Xie H.
      • Deng K.
      • Zhao W.
      • Yang C.
      • Lou G.
      • Hou Y.
      • Li K.
      Predicting ovarian cancer recurrence by plasma metabolic profiles before and after surgery.
      ,
      • Bachmayr-Heyda A.
      • Aust S.
      • Auer K.
      • Meier S.M.
      • Schmetterer K.G.
      • Dekan S.
      • Gerner C.
      • Pils D.
      Integrative systemic and local metabolomics with impact on survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
      ]. Cell line and patient derived xenografts as well as knock out mouse models have been explored for actionable metabolic vulnerabilities [
      • Gentric G.
      • Kieffer Y.
      • Mieulet V.
      • Goundiam O.
      • Bonneau C.
      • Nemati F.
      • Hurbain I.
      • Raposo G.
      • Popova T.
      • Stern M.H.
      • Lallemand-Breitenbach V.
      • Müller S.
      • Cañeque T.
      • Rodriguez R.
      • Vincent-Salomon A.
      • de Thé H.
      • Rossignol R.
      • Mechta-Grigoriou F.
      PML-regulated mitochondrial metabolism enhances chemosensitivity in human ovarian cancers.
      ]. More recently fatty acid synthesis has been suggested as a novel target for therapy against ovarian peritoneal metastases [
      • Chen R.R.
      • Yung M.M.H.
      • Xuan Y.
      • Zhan S.
      • Leung L.L.
      • Liang R.R.
      • Leung T.H.Y.
      • Yang H.
      • Xu D.
      • Sharma R.
      • Chan K.K.L.
      • Ngu S.F.
      • Ngan H.Y.S.
      • Chan D.W.
      Targeting of lipid metabolism with a metabolic inhibitor cocktail eradicates peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer cells.
      ].
      The limitations of the study include the relatively small sample size and possible selection bias based upon single institution accrual. Patients were accrued by clinical research coordinators based upon clinical presentation and protocol criteria, but unintended biases may have arisen. There could be concern that the metabolic results reflect algorithms or ratios that were selectively defined to achieve desired results. To address this concern, we used training sets followed by confirmatory analyses that examined established biochemical parameters, previously described in the literature, to statistically support our findings.
      We recognize that laboratory platforms can only approximate the complexity of human biology. In this study, plasma metabolites were used to provide insights into each individual's metabolic status as conditions of metabolic stress can promote malignant transformation.
      Recognizing that plasma measurements are a surrogate for cellular changes, we have begun the study of tumor cell metabolism by extracting peri-tumoral culture media for MS/MS analysis and will plan to report those findings as that data matures.
      Our findings indicate clinically significant increases in disease-free survival in patients found to be platinum sensitive. We and others have shown that platinum resistance can be addressed with gemcitabine-based doublets in some patients [
      • Rose P.G.
      • Mossbruger K.
      • Fusco N.
      • Smrekar M.
      • Eaton S.
      • Rodriguez M.
      Gemcitabine reverses cisplatin resistance: demonstration of activity in platinum- and multidrug-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma.
      ,
      • Safra T.
      • Asna N.
      • Veizman A.
      • et al.
      The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin shows similar efficacy in the treatment of platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
      ], suggesting that the pre-treatment measurement of platinum responsiveness could offer prognostic and therapeutics insights.
      The results identify metabolic changes in patients with gynecologic malignancies that appear to promote carcinogenesis. Altered lipid and amino acid metabolism creates an environment for malignant transformation. Cells confronting nutritional deficiencies re-program their metabolism in a manner that promotes malignantly transformed cell survival at the expense of the host. This survival advantage functions not only establish the malignant clone but to protect it from exogenous stresses like those associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and heightened immune surveillance. Our findings re-define individual patient response and survival not as a function of “drug resistance” but instead as a function of inherent (biochemical) “drug insensitivity”.

      Research funding

      Supported by Research Grants from Todd Cancer Institute, Long Beach California, and São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP) grants 2014/19171-2 and 2015/16921-3, São Paulo, Brazil. AMP was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1 TR001414. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

      Declaration of Competing Interest

      Krishnansu S. Tewari, Robert E. Bristow, Fabio Cappuccini, Marcia B. Salzgeber, Anton M. Palma, Dirce M. L. Marchioni, Antonio A.F. Carioca, Kristine R. Penner, Jill Alldredge and Teresa Longoria have no conflicts of interest to declare. Paulo D'Amora (research grants from funding agencies: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP); financial support for attending symposia and for educational programs: Nagourney Cancer Institute, American Association for Cancer Research, Rivkin Center; consultation: Metabolomycs, Inc.; intellectual property rights: Metabolomycs, Inc.; stockholder: Metabolomycs, Inc.). Steven S. Evans (employment: Nagourney Cancer Institute; stockholder: Metabolomycs, Inc.). Paula J. Addis-Bernard (employment: Nagourney Cancer Institute). Ismael Dale C.G. Silva (board director: Metabolomycs, Inc.; stockholder: Metabolomycs, Inc.). Robert A. Nagourney (board director: Nagourney Cancer Institute and Metabolomycs, Inc.; stockholder: Metabolomycs, Inc.). We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

      Acknowlegements

      The completion of this study could not have been possible without the participation and assistance of OBGYN residents and GYONC fellows from Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at UCI involved in the treatment and sample collection of the ovarian cancer patients accrued in the protocol since 2015. Their contributions are sincerely appreciated and gratefully acknowledged. Dr. D'Amora received a Young Investigator Award as well as a postdoctoral scholarship from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) and was also recipient of two Scholar-In-Training Awards: first at the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium held in Seattle, WA, USA, in 2016 and a second one at the 2nd AACR International Conference on Translational Cancer Medicine, held in São Paulo, Brazil, in 2017, both sponsored by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).
      This work is dedicated to the memory and the legacy of the late Professor Phillip J. DiSaia, former Director of the Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University of California Irvine (UCI), for all his support to our team during these years and his enthusiasm for new ideas on early diagnosis for ovarian cancer, authors are deeply grateful for his support.

      Appendix A. Supplementary data

      Supplementary Fig. 1
      The following are the supplementary data related to this article.Supplementary Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier plots for high grade serous carcinoma only for time to progression, disease-free survival, and overall survival by ex vivo platinum resistance vs. sensitivity (LC50 CDDP dichotomized above vs. below the median 0.9 μg/mL) (A,B,C) and metabolomic signatures ( D,E,F).
      Supplementary Fig. 2
      Supplementary Fig. 2(A-J). Training Set (Control = 31 x Ovarian Cancer = 13) vs Validation Set (Control = 76 X Ovarian Cancer = 41) depicting the metabolites (μM/L) and ratios pointed by arrows in (Heatmap). These results reveal that ovarian cancer patients compared with controls have elevations in short and long-chain acyl-carnitines with decreases in structural lipids, particularly phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelins. Validation of these findings at 0.8f statistical power (controls = 76 and ovarian cancer = 41) are demonstrated.
      Supplementary Fig. 3
      Supplementary Fig. 3(A-F). Training Set (Control = 31 X Ovarian Cancer = 13) vs Validation Set (Control = 76 X Ovarian Cancer = 41) (0.8 Statistical Power) depict metabolites, sums and ratios used to access mitochondrial oxidation deficiencies. Elevation of short and long-chain acyl-carnitines and decreases in structural lipids particularly phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelins, are evidenced in ovarian cancer patients compared to controls. Ratios of acyl-carnitines, tryptophan and structural lipids clearly discriminate ovarian cancer patients from controls. Validation of these findings, at 0.8 of statistical power are demonstrated.
      Supplementary Fig. 4
      Supplementary Fig. 4(A-K). Training Set (Controls = 31 X Ovarian Cancer = 13) vs Validation Set (Controls = 76 X Ovarian Cancer = 41) (0.8 Statistical Power) depict biochemical disturbances including altered amino acids (tryptophan, citrulline, branched-chain amino acids (Leu + Ile + Val), kynurenine and ornithine) in ovarian cancer patients. Lower tryptophan (A) and BCAA (C) (p = 3.90e-24 and p = 2.60e-11, respectively) were detected in ovarian cancer patients. Lower levels of citrulline (p = 4.20e-7) (B) and essential lipids (p = 1.51e-8) lyso-phosphatidylcholine C18:2 (D) are consistent with enteric absorption deficiency. Citrulline levels may also reflect urea cycle dysregulation as does the increased ornithine to Citrulline ratio (Orn/Cit) (E) (p = 4.52e-11). Altered IDO and TDO are reflected by Kyn/Trp (F) (F). Systemic methylation status is reflected by the arginine derivative Symmetric Dimethylated Arginine (SDMA) found up-regulated in cases compared to controls (G). Liver function disturbances are evidenced by the lower (Val/Phe) ratio (H). This is supported by the concentrations of structural lipids that were found lower in ovarian cancer patients (I), as de-novo biosynthesis of structural lipids occurs almost exclusively in liver ( H and I).
      Supplementary Fig. 5
      Supplementary Fig. 5(A-F). Graphical depiction of relevant biochemical changes from training Set (Control = 31 X Ovarian Cancer = 13) vs Validation Set (Control =76 X Ovarian Cancer = 41) (0.8 Statistical Power) that segregate cases from controls.
      Supplementary Fig. 6
      Supplementary Fig. 6Three-Dimensional Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for cases from both training and validation sets are depicted from unsupervised multivariate analysis that segregates malignant (Light blue and Green) from non-malignant (Dark blue and Red) blood samples.

      References

        • Hussain I.
        • Xu J.
        • Deng K.
        • Noor-Ul-Amin
        • Wang C.
        • Huang Y.
        • Li S.
        • Li K.
        The prevalence and associated factors for liver metastases, development and prognosis in newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer: a large population-based study from the SEER database.
        J. Cancer. 2020 Jun 8; 11 (PMID: 32626533; PMCID: PMC7330699): 4861-4869https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.40590
        • Bristow R.E.
        • Tomacruz R.S.
        • Armstrong D.K.
        • Trimble E.L.
        • Montz F.J.
        Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2002 Mar 1; 20: 1248-1259https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248
        • Memarzadeh S.
        • Holschneider C.H.
        • Bristow R.E.
        • et al.
        FIGO stage III and IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma: impact of residual disease on survival.
        Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2002; 12: 454-458https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01149.x
        • McGuire W.P.
        • Hoskins W.J.
        • Brady M.F.
        • Kucera P.R.
        • Partridge E.E.
        • Look K.Y.
        • Clarke-Pearson D.L.
        • Davidson M.
        Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1996 Jan 4; 334: 1-6https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199601043340101
        • Sovak M.A.
        • Dupont J.
        • Hensley M.L.
        • Ishill N.
        • Gerst S.
        • Abu-Rustum N.
        • Anderson S.
        • Barakat R.
        • Konner J.
        • Poyner E.
        • Sabbatini P.
        • Spriggs D.R.
        • Aghajanian C.
        Paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a large retrospective study.
        Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. Jan-Feb 2007; 17: 197-203https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00746.x
        • Markman M.
        • Rothman R.
        • Hakes T.
        • Reichman B.
        • Hoskins W.
        • Rubin S.
        • Jones W.
        • Almadrones L.
        • Lewis Jr., J.L.
        Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 1991 Mar; 9: 389-393https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.389
        • Nagao S.
        • Nishio S.
        • Michimae H.
        • Tanabe H.
        • Okada S.
        • Otsuki T.
        • Tanioka M.
        • Fujiwara K.
        • Suzuki M.
        • Kigawa J.
        Applicability of the concept of “platinum sensitivity” to recurrent endometrial cancer: the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2013 Dec; 131 (Epub 2013 Sep 25): 567-573https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.021
        • Muggia F.
        Platinum compounds 30 years after the introduction of cisplatin: implications for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2009 Jan; 112 (Epub 2008 Oct 31. PMID: 18977023): 275-281https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.034
        • Bowden N.A.
        Nucleotide excision repair: why is it not used to predict response to platinum-based chemotherapy?.
        Cancer Lett. 2014 May 1; 346 (Epub 2014 Jan 21): 163-171https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.01.005
        • Hansson J.
        • Wood R.D.
        Repair synthesis by human cell extracts in DNA damaged by cis- and trans-diamminedichloroplatinum (II).
        Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Oct 25; 17: 8073-8091https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.20.8073
        • Hansson J.
        • Grossman L.
        • Lindahl T.
        • Wood R.D.
        Complementation of the xeroderma pigmentosum DNA repair synthesis defect with Escherichia coli UvrABC proteins in a cell-free system.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jan 11; 18: 35-40https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.1.35
        • Calvert A.H.
        • Newell D.R.
        • Gumbrell L.A.
        • O’Reilly S.
        • Burnell M.
        • Boxall F.E.
        • Siddik Z.H.
        • Judson I.R.
        • Gore M.E.
        • Wiltshaw E.
        Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 1989 Nov; 7 (PMID: 2681557): 1748-1756https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1748
        • Eisenhauer E.A.
        • Therasse P.
        • Bogaerts J.
        • Schwartz L.H.
        • Sargent D.
        • Ford R.
        • Dancey J.
        • Arbuck S.
        • Gwyther S.
        • Mooney M.
        • Rubinstein L.
        • Shankar L.
        • Dodd L.
        • Kaplan R.
        • Lacombe D.
        • Verweij J.
        New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
        Eur. J. Cancer. 2009 Jan; 45 (PMID: 19097774): 228-247https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
        • Nagourney R.A.
        • Sommers B.L.
        • Harper S.M.
        • Radecki S.
        • Evans S.S.
        Ex vivo analysis of topotecan: advancing the application of laboratory-based clinical therapeutics.
        Br. J. Cancer. 2003 Nov 3; 89 (PMID: 14583785; PMCID: PMC2394409): 1789-1795https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601336
        • Nagourney R.A.
        • Brewer C.A.
        • Radecki S.
        • Kidder W.A.
        • Sommers B.L.
        • Evans S.S.
        • Minor D.R.
        • DiSaia P.J.
        Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin repeating doublet therapy in previously treated, relapsed ovarian cancer patients.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2003 Jan; 88 (PMID: 12504624): 35-39https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2002.6855
        • Xia J.
        • Wishart D.S.
        Web-based inference of biological patterns, functions, and pathways from metabolomic data using MetaboAnalyst.
        Nat. Protoc. 2011; 6: 743-760
        • Xia J.
        • Wishart D.S.
        MSEA: a web-based tool to identify biologically meaningful patterns in quantitative metabolomic data.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38: W71-W77
        • Allalou A.
        • Nalla A.
        • Prentice K.J.
        • Liu Y.
        • Zhang M.
        • Dai F.F.
        • Ning X.
        • Osborne L.R.
        • Cox B.J.
        • Gunderson E.P.
        • Wheeler M.B.
        A predictive metabolic signature for the transition from gestational diabetes mellitus to type 2 diabetes.
        Diabetes. 2016 Sep; 65 (Epub 2016 Jun 23. PMID: 27338739; PMCID: PMC5001181): 2529-2539https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-1720
        • Fischer J.E.
        • Rosen H.M.
        • Ebeid A.M.
        • James J.H.
        • Keane J.M.
        • Soeters P.B.
        The effect of normalization of plasma amino acids on hepatic encephalopathy in man.
        Surgery. 1976 Jul; 80 (PMID: 818729): 77-91
        • da Silva I.
        • da Costa Vieira R.
        • Stella C.
        • Loturco E.
        • Carvalho A.L.
        • Veo C.
        • Neto C.
        • Silva S.M.
        • D’Amora P.
        • Salzgeber M.
        • Matos D.
        • Silva C.R.
        • Oliveira J.R.
        • Rabelo I.
        • Yamakawa P.
        • Maciel R.
        • Biscolla R.
        • Chiamolera M.
        • Fraietta R.
        • Reis F.
        • Mori M.
        • Marchioni D.
        • Carioca A.
        • Maciel G.
        • Tomioka R.
        • Baracat E.
        • Silva C.
        • Granato C.
        • Diaz R.
        • Scarpellini B.
        • Egle D.
        • Fiegl H.
        • Himmel I.
        • Troi C.
        • Nagourney R.
        Inborn-like errors of metabolism are determinants of breast cancer risk, clinical response and survival: a study of human biochemical individuality.
        Oncotarget. 2018 Aug 3; 9 (PMID: 30167086; PMCID: PMC6114970): 31664-31681https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25839
        • Markman M.
        • Rothman R.
        • Hakes T.
        • Reichman B.
        • Hoskins W.
        • Rubin S.
        • Jones W.
        • Almadrones L.
        • Lewis Jr., J.L.
        Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 1991 Mar; 9: 389-393https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.389
        • Black M.M.
        • Speer F.D.
        Further observations on the effects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents on the in vitro dehydrogenase activity of cancer tissue.
        J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1954 Apr; 14: 1147-1158
        • Salmon S.E.
        • Hamburger A.W.
        • Soehnlen B.
        • Durie B.G.
        • Alberts D.S.
        • Moon T.E.
        Quantitation of differential sensitivity of human-tumor stem cells to anticancer drugs.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1978 Jun 15; 298: 1321-1327https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197806152982401
        • Kerr J.F.
        • Wyllie A.H.
        • Currie A.R.
        Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics.
        Br. J. Cancer. 1972; 26: 239-257https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1972.33
        • Nagourney R.A.
        Ex vivo programmed cell death and the prediction of response to chemotherapy.
        Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 2006; 7: 103-110https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0045-2
        • Nagourney R.A.
        • Blitzer J.B.
        • Shuman R.L.
        • et al.
        Functional profiling to select chemotherapy in untreated, advanced, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
        Anticancer Res. 2012; 32: 4453-4460
        • Hanahan D.
        • Weinberg R.A.
        Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.
        Cell. 2011 Mar 4; 144 (PMID: 21376230): 646-674https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
        • ICON Collaborators. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Study
        ICON2: randomised trial of single-agent carboplatin against three-drug combination of CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in women with ovarian cancer.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 1571-1576
        • International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group
        Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 2003 Feb 22;361(9358):706].
        Lancet. 2002; 360: 505-515https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09738-6
        • Muggia F.M.
        • Braly P.S.
        • Brady M.F.
        • et al.
        Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2000; 18: 106-115https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.106
        • Rose P.G.
        • Mossbruger K.
        • Fusco N.
        • Smrekar M.
        • Eaton S.
        • Rodriguez M.
        Gemcitabine reverses cisplatin resistance: demonstration of activity in platinum- and multidrug-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2003; 88: 17-21https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2002.6850
        • Safra T.
        • Asna N.
        • Veizman A.
        • et al.
        The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin shows similar efficacy in the treatment of platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
        Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2014; 25: 340-345https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000000042
      1. Lichter-Konecki U, Caldovic L, Morizono H, Simpson K. Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency. 2013 Aug 29 [updated 2016 Apr 14]. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Mirzaa G, Amemiya A. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2021. (PMID: 24006547).

        • Lee J.S.
        • Adler L.
        • Karathia H.
        • et al.
        Urea cycle dysregulation generates clinically relevant genomic and biochemical signatures.
        Cell. 2018; 174 (e22): 1559-1570
        • Smith L.P.
        • Bitler B.G.
        • Richer J.K.
        • Christenson J.L.
        Tryptophan catabolism in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
        Trends Cancer Res. 2019; 14: 1-9
        • Plewa S.
        • Horała A.
        • Dereziński P.
        • Nowak-Markwitz E.
        • Matysiak J.
        • Kokot Z.J.
        Wide spectrum targeted metabolomics identifies potential ovarian cancer biomarkers.
        Life Sci. 2019 Apr 1; 222 (Epub 2019 Mar 7. PMID: 30853626): 235-244https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.03.004
        • Zhang F.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Ke C.
        • Li A.
        • Wang W.
        • Yang K.
        • Liu H.
        • Xie H.
        • Deng K.
        • Zhao W.
        • Yang C.
        • Lou G.
        • Hou Y.
        • Li K.
        Predicting ovarian cancer recurrence by plasma metabolic profiles before and after surgery.
        Metabolomics. 2018 Apr 26; 14 (PMID: 30830339): 65https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-018-1354-8
        • Bachmayr-Heyda A.
        • Aust S.
        • Auer K.
        • Meier S.M.
        • Schmetterer K.G.
        • Dekan S.
        • Gerner C.
        • Pils D.
        Integrative systemic and local metabolomics with impact on survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
        Clin. Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15; 23 (Epub 2016 Oct 19. PMID: 27797973): 2081-2092https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1647
        • Gentric G.
        • Kieffer Y.
        • Mieulet V.
        • Goundiam O.
        • Bonneau C.
        • Nemati F.
        • Hurbain I.
        • Raposo G.
        • Popova T.
        • Stern M.H.
        • Lallemand-Breitenbach V.
        • Müller S.
        • Cañeque T.
        • Rodriguez R.
        • Vincent-Salomon A.
        • de Thé H.
        • Rossignol R.
        • Mechta-Grigoriou F.
        PML-regulated mitochondrial metabolism enhances chemosensitivity in human ovarian cancers.
        Cell Metab. 2019 Jan 8; 29 (e10) (Epub 2018 Sep 20. PMID: 30244973; PMCID: PMC6331342): 156-173
        • Chen R.R.
        • Yung M.M.H.
        • Xuan Y.
        • Zhan S.
        • Leung L.L.
        • Liang R.R.
        • Leung T.H.Y.
        • Yang H.
        • Xu D.
        • Sharma R.
        • Chan K.K.L.
        • Ngu S.F.
        • Ngan H.Y.S.
        • Chan D.W.
        Targeting of lipid metabolism with a metabolic inhibitor cocktail eradicates peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer cells.
        Commun Biol. 2019 Jul 31; 2 (PMID: 31372520; PMCID: PMC6668395): 281https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0508-1