Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 157, ISSUE 3, P706-710, June 2020

Download started.

Ok

Is hormonal therapy after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy associated with an increased risk of malignancy in pathogenic variant carriers?

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present Address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
    Kathryn A. Mills
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC2050, Chicago, IL 60637, United States of America.
    Footnotes
    1 Present Address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    3 Present Address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Abington, PA.
    Tanvi V. Joshi
    Footnotes
    3 Present Address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Abington, PA.
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lindsay West
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    2 Present Address: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Women's Health Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology. Cleveland, OH.
    Michelle Kuznicki
    Footnotes
    2 Present Address: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Women's Health Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology. Cleveland, OH.
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Laura Kent
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Alexis N. Hokenstad
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • James C. Cripe
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Candice Woolfolk
    Affiliations
    Division of Oncologic Biostatistics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Leigha Senter
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robert M. Wenham
    Affiliations
    Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • David E. Cohn
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Victoria Bae-Jump
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Premal H. Thaker
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present Address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
    2 Present Address: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Women's Health Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology. Cleveland, OH.
    3 Present Address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Abington, PA.

      Highlights

      • Multi-institutional study of high risk variant carriers after risk reducing procedure
      • Receiving hormonal therapy after a risk reductive procedure was not associated with increased risk of malignancy.
      • There were no subsequent gynecologic carcinomas identified in either group.
      • Being younger and undergoing other risk reductive procedures increased use of hormonal therapy.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      This study aimed to assess the association between hormone replacement therapy and the incidence of subsequent malignancies in patients who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and had mutations predisposing them to Müllerian cancers.

      Methods

      This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study was performed at five academic institutions. Women were included if they were age 18–51 years, had one or more confirmed germline highly penetrant pathogenic variants, and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with a prior malignancy were excluded. Clinicodemographic data were collected by chart review. Patients with no documented contact for one year prior to study termination were called to confirm duration of hormone use and occurrence of secondary outcomes. Hormone replacement therapy included any combination of estrogen or progesterone.

      Results

      Data were analyzed for 159 women, of which 82 received hormone replacement therapy and 77 did not. In both groups an average of 6 years since risk reduction had passed. The patients treated with hormone replacement therapy did not have a higher risk of subsequent malignancy than those not treated with hormone replacement therapy (6 out of 82 vs. 7 out of 77, P = .68). Patients who received hormone replacement therapy were younger than those who did not receive hormone replacement therapy (39.0 vs. 43.9 years, P < .01) and were more likely to have undergone other risk reductive procedures including mastectomy and/or hysterectomy, though this difference was not statistically significant (69.5% vs. 55.8%, P = .07).

      Conclusions

      In this multi-institution retrospective study of data from patients with high-risk variant carriers who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of malignancy between women who did and did not receive hormone replacement therapy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gynecologic Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Berek J.S.
        • Chalas E.
        • Edelson M.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic and risk-reducing bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy: recommendations based on risk of ovarian cancer.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 116: 733-743
        • Daly M.B.
        • Pilarski R.
        • Berry M.
        • et al.
        NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2017.
        15. 2017: 9 (1)
        • Gupta S.
        • Provenzale D.
        • Regenbogen S.E.
        • et al.
        NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 3.2017.
        15. 2017: 1465 (12)
        • Greene M.H.
        • Piedmonte M.
        • Alberts D.
        • et al.
        A prospective study of risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy and longitudinal CA-125 screening among women at increased genetic risk of ovarian Cancer: design and baseline characteristics: a gynecologic oncology group study.
        Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2008; 17: 594-604
        • Kwon J.S.
        • Tinker A.
        • Pansegrau G.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy as an alternative for BRCA mutation carriers.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 121: 14-24
        • Investigators WGftWsHI
        Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal WomenPrincipal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2002; 288: 321-333
        • Eisen A.
        • Lubinski J.
        • Gronwald J.
        • et al.
        Hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
        J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 1361-1367
        • Kotsopoulos J.
        • Gronwald J.
        • Karlan B.Y.
        • et al.
        Hormone replacement therapy after oophorectomy and breast Cancer risk among BRCA1 mutation carriers.
        JAMA Oncology. 2018; 4: 1059-1065
        • Birrer N.
        • Chinchilla C.
        • Del Carmen M.
        • Dizon D.S.
        Is hormone replacement therapy safe in women with a BRCA mutation? A systematic review of the contemporary literature.
        Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018; 41: 313-315
        • Gordhandas S.
        • Norquist B.M.
        • Pennington K.P.
        • Yung R.L.
        • Laya M.B.
        • Swisher E.M.
        Hormone replacement therapy after risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations; a systematic review of risks and benefits.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2019; 153: 192-200
        • Etchegary H.
        • Dicks E.
        • Watkins K.
        • Alani S.
        • Dawson L.
        Decisions about prophylactic gynecologic surgery: a qualitative study of the experience of female Lynch syndrome mutation carriers.
        Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2015; 13: 10
        • Marchetti C.
        • De Felice F.
        • Boccia S.
        • et al.
        Hormone replacement therapy after prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a meta-analysis.
        Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2018; 132: 111-115
        • Foulkes W.D.
        • Metcalfe K.
        • Sun P.
        • et al.
        Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1 and BRCA2-related breast cancer: the influence of age, grade, and histological type.
        Clin. Cancer Res. 2004; 10: 2029-2034
        • Lavie O.
        • Hornreich G.
        • Ben-Arie A.
        • et al.
        BRCA germline mutations in Jewish women with uterine serous papillary carcinoma.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2004; 92: 521-524
        • Beiner M.E.
        • Finch A.
        • Rosen B.
        • et al.
        The risk of endometrial cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. A prospective study.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2007; 104: 7-10
        • Levine D.A.
        • Lin O.
        • Barakat R.R.
        • et al.
        Risk of endometrial carcinoma associated with BRCA mutation.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2001; 80: 395-398
        • Shu C.A.
        • Pike M.C.
        • Jotwani A.R.
        • et al.
        Uterine cancer after risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy without hysterectomy in women with BRCA mutations uterine cancer after risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy uterine cancer after risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy.
        JAMA Oncology. 2016; 2: 1434-1440
        • Meyer L.A.
        • Broaddus R.R.
        • Lu K.H.
        Endometrial cancer and lynch syndrome: clinical and pathologic considerations.
        Cancer Control. 2009; 16: 14-22
        • Tafe L.J.
        • Riggs E.R.
        • Tsongalis G.J.
        Lynch syndrome presenting as endometrial cancer.
        Clin. Chem. 2014; 60: 111
        • DRN K.H.L.
        • Norquist B.
        • Bowen D.J.
        • Bakkum-Gamez J.N.
        • Romero I.
        • Long Roche K.
        • Levine D.A.
        • Soletsky B.
        • Carter J.
        • Hickey M.
        • Crase J.
        • Gavin K.
        • Polinsky D.
        • Swisher E.M.
        WISP: A Prospective, Multi-Center Trial of Salpingectomy with Delayed Oophorectomy Versus Risk Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Women at Increased Risk for Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Paper Presented at: 50th Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology; March 16–19, 2019.
        2019 (Honolulu, Hawaii)
        • Nebgen D.R.
        • Hurteau J.
        • Holman L.L.
        • et al.
        Bilateral salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer risk reduction: a pilot study in women with BRCA1/2 mutations.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2018; 150: 79-84
      1. . M.P. Steenbeek MGH, D. TUBA group, R.P.M.G. Hermens and J.A. de Hullu. Worry and regret in the prospective multicentre TUBA study in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Paper Presented at: 50th Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology; March 16–19, 2019, 2019; (Honolulu, Hawaii).