Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 157, ISSUE 1, P106-114, April 2020

Download started.

Ok

Germline mutations of SMARCA4 in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type and in SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: Clinical features of a single family and comparison of large cohorts

Published:January 15, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.031

      Highlights

      • SCCOHT and SMARCA4-DUS are morphological and genetically related tumors driven by loss of function mutations in SMARCA4.
      • These tumors affect young women and generally carry a poor prognosis.
      • Identification of germline mutations in SMARCA4 is critical to providing counseling and treatment to affected individuals.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (SMARCA4-DUS) are rare and aggressive tumors, primarily affecting pre- and perimenopausal women. Inactivating SMARCA4 mutations are thought to be the driving molecular events in the majority of these tumors. Here, we report the clinical course of a family with germline SMARCA4 mutation and compare large cohorts of these rare tumor types.

      Methods

      We extracted clinico-pathological medical record data for the family with germline SMARCA4 mutation. Clinico-genomic data from SCCOHT and SMARCA4-DUS cohorts were retrospectively extracted from the archives of a large CLIA-certified reference molecular laboratory.

      Results

      We identified a single family with an inherited germline SMARCA4 mutation, in which two different family members developed either SCCOHT or SMARCA4-DUS, both of whom died within one year of diagnosis, despite aggressive surgical, chemotherapy and immunotherapy treatment. Retrospective comparative analysis of large SCCOHT (n = 48) and SMARCA4-DUS (n = 17) cohorts revealed that SCCOHT patients were younger (median age: 28.5 vs. 49.0) and more likely to have germline SMARCA4 alterations (37.5% vs. 11.8%) than SMARCA4-DUS patients.

      Conclusions

      Growing understanding of the role SMARCA4 plays in the pathogenesis of these rare cancers may inform recommended genetic testing and counseling in families with these tumor types.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gynecologic Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ramos P.
        • Karnezis A.N.
        • Craig D.W.
        • et al.
        Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type, displays frequent inactivating germline and somatic mutations in SMARCA4.
        Nat. Genet. 2014; 46: 427-429https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2928
        • Witkowski L.
        • Carrot-Zhang J.
        • Albrecht S.
        • et al.
        Germline and somatic SMARCA4 mutations characterize small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type.
        Nat. Genet. 2014; 46: 438-443https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2931
        • Kolin D.L.
        • Dong F.
        • Baltay M.
        • et al.
        SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (malignant rhabdoid tumor of the uterus): a clinicopathologic entity distinct from undifferentiated carcinoma.
        Mod. Pathol. 2018; 31: 1442-1456https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-018-0049-z
        • Lin D.I.
        • Allen J.M.
        • Hecht J.L.
        • et al.
        SMARCA4 inactivation defines a subset of undifferentiated uterine sarcomas with rhabdoid and small cell features and germline mutation association.
        Mod Pathol. June 2019; 1https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0303-z
        • Hodges C.
        • Kirkland J.G.
        • Crabtree G.R.
        The many roles of BAF (mSWI/SNF) and PBAF complexes in cancer.
        Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016; 6https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a026930
        • Wilson B.G.
        • Roberts C.W.M.
        SWI/SNF nucleosome remodellers and cancer.
        Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011; 11: 481-492https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3068
        • Agaimy A.
        • Fuchs F.
        • Moskalev E.A.
        SMARCA4-deficient pulmonary adenocarcinoma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of a novel aggressive neoplasm with a consistent TTF1neg/CK7pos/HepPar-1pos immunophenotype.
        Virchows Arch. 2017; 471https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2148-5
        • Agarwal R.
        • Chan Y.-C.
        • Tam C.S.
        • et al.
        Dynamic molecular monitoring reveals that SWI–SNF mutations mediate resistance to ibrutinib plus venetoclax in mantle cell lymphoma.
        Nat. Med. 2019; 25: 119-129https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0243-z
        • Skowron P.
        • Ramaswamy V.
        • Taylor M.D.
        Genetic and molecular alterations across medulloblastoma subgroups.
        J Mol Med Berl Ger. 2015; 93: 1075-1084https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-015-1333-8
        • Filippakopoulos P.
        • Knapp S.
        Chapter 10: bromodomains as anticancer targets.
        in: Egger G. Arimondo P. Drug Discovery in Cancer Epigenetics. Academic Press, Boston2016: 239-271https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802208-5.00010-2
        • Han Y.
        • Ren J.
        • Yu W.
        • Terashima M.
        • Muegge K.
        Chapter 7: malignant transformation and epigenetics.
        in: Lu Q. Chang C.C. Richardson B.C. Epigenetics and Dermatology. Academic Press, Boston2015: 113-135https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800957-4.00007-2
        • Tang M.
        • Luo H.
        • Lu J.
        Chapter 12: genetically altered cancer epigenome.
        in: Huang S. Litt M.D. Blakey C.A. Epigenetic Gene Expression and Regulation. Academic Press, Oxford2015: 265-289https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799958-6.00012-3
        • Köbel M.
        • Hoang L.N.
        • Tessier-Cloutier B.
        Undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas show frequent loss of core switch/sucrose nonfermentable complex proteins.
        Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 42
        • Solomon D.A.
        • Perry A.
        Chapter 22: familial tumor syndromes.
        in: Perry A. Brat D.J. Practical Surgical Neuropathology: A Diagnostic Approach. second ed. Elsevier, 2018: 505-545https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-44941-0.00022-9
        • Le Loarer F.
        • Watson S.
        • Pierron G.
        • et al.
        SMARCA4 inactivation defines a group of undifferentiated thoracic malignancies transcriptionally related to BAF-deficient sarcomas.
        Nat. Genet. 2015; 47: 1200
        • Perret R.
        • Chalabreysse L.
        • Watson S.
        SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas.
        Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018; 43https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001188
        • Lin D.I.
        • Chudnovsky Y.
        • Duggan B.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive genomic profiling reveals inactivating SMARCA4 mutations and low tumor mutational burden in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic-type.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2017; 147: 626-633https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.031
        • Sun J.X.
        • He Y.
        • Sanford E.
        A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
        PLoS Comput. Biol. 2018; 14https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005965
        • Frampton G.M.
        • Fichtenholtz A.
        • Otto G.A.
        Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing.
        Nat. Biotechnol. 2013; 31https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2696
        • Lek M.
        • Karczewski K.J.
        • Minikel E.V.
        • et al.
        Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.
        Nature. 2016; 536: 285-291https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19057
        • Witkowski L.
        • Goudie C.
        • Ramos P.
        • et al.
        The influence of clinical and genetic factors on patient outcome in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2016; 141: 454-460https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.013
        • Cerami E.
        • Gao J.
        • Dogrusoz U.
        The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data.
        Cancer Discov. 2012; 2https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095
        • Gao J.
        • Aksoy B.A.
        • Dogrusoz U.
        Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal.
        Sci. Signal. 2013; 6https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2004088
        • Pautier P.
        • Ribrag V.
        • Duvillard P.
        • et al.
        Results of a prospective dose-intensive regimen in 27 patients with small cell carcinoma of the ovary of the hypercalcemic type.
        Ann. Oncol. 2007; 18: 1985-1989https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm376
        • Callegaro-Filho D.
        • Gershenson D.M.
        • Nick A.M.
        • et al.
        Small cell carcinoma of the ovary-hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT): a review of 47 cases.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2016; 140: 53-57https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.004
        • Chan-Penebre E.
        • Armstrong K.
        • Drew A.
        Selective killing of SMARCA2- and SMARCA4-deficient small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type cells by inhibition of EZH2: in vitro and in vivo preclinical models.
        Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017; 16https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0678
        • Jones R.L.
        • Blay J.-Y.
        • Agulnik M.
        • et al.
        1612PDA phase II, multicenter study of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in adults (rhabdoid tumor cohort) (NCT02601950).
        Ann. Oncol. 2018; 29https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy299.011
        • Lang J.D.
        • Hendricks W.P.D.
        • Orlando K.A.
        • et al.
        Ponatinib shows potent antitumor activity in small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) through multikinase inhibition.
        Clin. Cancer Res. 2018; 24: 1932
        • Xue Y.
        • Meehan B.
        • Macdonald E.
        CDK4/6 inhibitors target SMARCA4-determined cyclin D1 deficiency in hypercalcemic small cell carcinoma of the ovary.
        Nat. Commun. 2019; 10https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06958-9
        • Jelinic P.
        • Ricca J.
        • Van Oudenhove E.
        • et al.
        Immune-active microenvironment in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type: rationale for immune checkpoint blockade.
        J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2018; 110: 787-790https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx277
        • Miao D.
        • Margolis C.A.
        • Gao W.
        • et al.
        Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
        Science. 2018; 359: 801-806https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5951
        • Berchuck A.
        • Witkowski L.
        • Hasselblatt M.
        • Foulkes W.D.
        Prophylactic oophorectomy for hereditary small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type.
        Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2015; 12: 20-22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2015.02.002
        • Pejovic T.
        • McCluggage W.G.
        • Krieg A.J.
        • et al.
        The dilemma of early preventive oophorectomy in familial small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcemic type.
        Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2019; 28: 47-49https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.02.002
        • Loren A.W.
        • Mangu P.B.
        • Beck L.N.
        • et al.
        Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2013; 31: 2500-2510https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678