Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 154, ISSUE 1, P177-182, July 2019

Malignant bowel obstruction due to uterine or ovarian cancer: Are there differences in outcome?

  • Claire Hoppenot
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 2050, Chicago, IL 60637, United States of America.
    Affiliations
    Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
    Pamela Peters
    Footnotes
    1 Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
    Affiliations
    Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    2 Present address: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
    Matthew Cowan
    Footnotes
    2 Present address: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
    Affiliations
    Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Elena Diaz Moore
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Kellogg Cancer Center, Northshore University Hospital, Evanston, IL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jean Hurteau
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Kellogg Cancer Center, Northshore University Hospital, Evanston, IL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nita Karnik Lee
    Affiliations
    Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • S. Diane Yamada
    Affiliations
    Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
    2 Present address: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

      Highlights

      • Survival after MBO diagnosis is 105 days.
      • MBO associated with uterine cancers have worse prognosis than those from ovarian cancers.
      • Surgery may mitigate differences between ovarian and uterine cancer patients with MBO.
      • Palliative care consultations are associated with fewer readmissions for MBO
      • Discussions at the time of MBO should include expected survival with different interventions for uterine vs ovarian cancer.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To describe and compare treatments and outcomes of patients with malignant bowel obstructions (MBO) due to uterine or ovarian cancer.

      Methods

      Retrospective chart review from two institutions of women admitted 1/1/2005–12/31/2016 with a MBO from recurrent/progressive uterine or ovarian cancer. Data collected includes patient characteristics, cancer-directed treatments before and after MBO, MBO management strategies, and survival after MBO.

      Results

      Women with MBO from uterine cancer (n = 46) and ovarian cancer (n = 130) underwent similar inpatient interventions such as inpatient chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival (OS) after admission for MBO for all patients was 105 days and was shorter for uterine cancer patients (57 vs 131 days, p = 0.0013). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients who had surgery had similar survival (182 vs 210 days, p = 0.6), as did those discharged on hospice from their first admission for MBO (26 vs 38 days, p = 0.1). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients had similar rates of post-discharge chemotherapy (37% vs 50%, p = 0.12), but uterine cancer patients who had chemotherapy still had shorter survival (151 vs 225 days, p = 0.03).

      Conclusions

      MBO has a relatively poor prognosis. Ovarian and uterine cancer patients whose interventions included surgery or hospice had similar outcomes. Among patients managed medically without hospice, uterine cancer patients experienced worse survival, even when candidates for subsequent chemotherapy. Patient counseling regarding goals of care at this difficult juncture can be informed by these findings and will be enhanced by patient-reported and qualitative data on the patient experience with MBO.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gynecologic Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tuca A.
        • Guell E.
        • Martinez-Losada E.
        • Codorniu N.
        Malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer patients: epidemiology, management, and factors influencing spontaneous resolution.
        Cancer Manag. Res. 2012; 4: 159-169
        • Dvoretsky P.M.
        • Richards K.A.
        • Angel C.
        • Rabinowitz L.
        • Beecham J.B.
        • Bonfiglio T.A.
        Survival time, causes of death, and tumor/treatment-related morbidity in 100 women with ovarian cancer.
        Hum. Pathol. 1988; 19: 1273-1279
        • Lilley E.J.
        • Scott J.W.
        • Goldberg J.E.
        • Cauley C.E.
        • Temel J.S.
        • Epstein A.S.
        • et al.
        Survival, healthcare utilization, and end-of-life care among older adults with malignancy-associated bowel obstruction: comparative study of surgery, venting gastrostomy, or medical management.
        Ann. Surg. 2018; 267: 692-699
        • Mooney S.J.
        • Winner M.
        • Hershman D.L.
        • Wright J.D.
        • Feingold D.L.
        • Allendorf J.D.
        • et al.
        Bowel obstruction in elderly ovarian cancer patients: a population-based study.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2013; 129: 107-112
        • Terrah J.
        • Paul Olson C.P.
        • Brasel Karen J.
        • Schwarze Margaret L.
        Palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from carcinomatosis, a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2014; 149: 383-392
        • Perri T.
        • Korach J.
        • Ben-Baruch G.
        • Jakobson-Setton A.
        • Ben-David Hogen L.
        • Kalfon S.
        • et al.
        Bowel obstruction in recurrent gynecologic malignancies: defining who will benefit from surgical intervention.
        Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014; 40: 899-904
        • Diver E.
        • O'Connor O.
        • Garrett L.
        • Boruta D.
        • Goodman A.
        • Del Carmen M.
        • et al.
        Modest benefit of total parenteral nutrition and chemotherapy after venting gastrostomy tube placement.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2013; 129: 332-335
        • Slomovitz B.M.
        • Jiang Y.
        • Yates M.S.
        • Soliman P.T.
        • Johnston T.
        • Nowakowski M.
        • et al.
        Phase II study of everolimus and letrozole in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2015; 33: 930-936
        • Ricci S.
        • Stone R.L.
        • Fader A.N.
        Uterine leiomyosarcoma: epidemiology, contemporary treatment strategies and the impact of uterine morcellation.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2017; 145: 208-216
        • Landrum L.M.
        • Moore K.N.
        • Myers T.K.
        • Lanneau Jr., G.S.
        • McMeekin D.S.
        • Walker J.L.
        • et al.
        Stage IVB endometrial cancer: does applying an ovarian cancer treatment paradigm result in similar outcomes? A case-control analysis.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2009; 112: 337-341
        • Henry J.C.
        • Pouly S.
        • Sullivan R.
        • Sharif S.
        • Klemanski D.
        • Abdel-Misih S.
        • et al.
        A scoring system for the prognosis and treatment of malignant bowel obstruction.
        Surgery. 2012; 152 (discussion 56-7): 747-756
        • Bateni S.B.
        • Gingrich A.A.
        • Stewart S.L.
        • Meyers F.J.
        • Bold R.J.
        • Canter R.J.
        Hospital utilization and disposition among patients with malignant bowel obstruction: a population-based comparison of surgical to medical management.
        BMC Cancer. 2018; 18: 1166
        • Havrilesky L.J.
        • Alvarez Secord A.
        • Ehrisman J.A.
        • Berchuck A.
        • Valea F.A.
        • Lee P.S.
        • et al.
        Patient preferences in advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer.
        Cancer. 2014; 120: 3651-3659
        • Mahdi H.
        • Lockhart D.
        • Moslemi-Kebria M.
        • Rose P.G.
        Racial disparity in the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2014; 134: 510-515
        • Mahdi H.
        • Jernigan A.
        • Lockhart D.
        • Moslemi-Kebria M.
        • Rose P.G.
        Racial disparity in 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for ovarian cancer.
        Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2015; 25: 55-62
        • Brewer K.C.
        • Peterson C.E.
        • Davis F.G.
        • Hoskins K.
        • Pauls H.
        • Joslin C.E.
        The influence of neighborhood socioeconomic status and race on survival from ovarian cancer: a population-based analysis of Cook County, Illinois.
        Ann. Epidemiol. 2015; 25: 556-563
        • Terplan M.
        • Schluterman N.
        • McNamara E.J.
        • Tracy J.K.
        • Temkin S.M.
        Have racial disparities in ovarian cancer increased over time? An analysis of SEER data.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2012; 125: 19-24