Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 145, ISSUE 3, P549-554, June 2017

Download started.

Ok

Mortality reduction and cost-effectiveness of performing hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for prophylaxis against serous/serous-like uterine cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers

  • Laura J. Havrilesky
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Box 3079 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, United States

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, United States

    Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Haley A. Moss
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, United States

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Junzo Chino
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, United States

    Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Evan R. Myers
    Affiliations
    Division of Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, United States

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, United States

    Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Noah D. Kauff
    Affiliations
    Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • A cost-effectiveness model compared RRSO+/−hysterectomy for BRCA1 mutation carriers.
      • RRSO + immediate hysterectomy is more effective and less costly than RRSO.
      • Delayed risk-reducing hysterectomy is cost-effective for up to 25 years after RRSO.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To estimate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of performing hysterectomy during risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for BRCA1 mutation carriers.

      Methods

      Based on a recent prospective cohort study indicating an elevated incidence of serous/serous-like uterine cancers among BRCA1 mutation carriers, we constructed a modified Markov decision model from a payer perspective to inform decisions about performance of hysterectomy during RRSO at age 40. We assumed patients had previously undergone a risk-reducing mastectomy and had a residual risk of death from breast or ovarian cancer. Disease-specific survival, age-adjusted competing hysterectomy rates, and deaths from other causes were incorporated. Costs of risk-reducing surgery, competing hysterectomy, and care for serous/serous-like uterine cancer were included.

      Results

      A 40 year old woman who undergoes RRSO + Hysterectomy gains 4.9 additional months of overall survival (40.38 versus 39.97 undiscounted years) compared to RRSO alone. The lifetime probabilities of developing or dying from serous/serous-like uterine cancer in the RRSO group are 3.5% and 2%, respectively. The RRSO alone strategy has an average cost of $9013 compared to $8803 for RRSO + Hysterectomy, and is dominated (less effective and more costly) when compared to RRSO + Hysterectomy. In an alternative analysis, delayed hysterectomy remains a cost-effective prevention strategy with an ICER of less than $100,000/year for up to 25 years following RRSO at age 40.

      Conclusions

      The addition of hysterectomy to RRSO in a 40 year old BRCA1 mutation carrier results in a mean gain of 4.9 additional months of life and is cost-effective.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gynecologic Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005; 98: 179-181
        • Bulletins ACoP
        Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2009; 113: 6-11
        • Altman D.
        • Granath F.
        • Cnattingius S.
        • Falconer C.
        Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study.
        Lancet. 2007; 370: 1494-1499
        • Jelovsek J.E.
        • Maher C.
        • Barber M.D.
        Pelvic organ prolapse.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 1027-1038
        • Goshen R.
        • Chu W.
        • Elit L.
        • Pal T.
        • Hakimi J.
        • Ackerman I.
        • et al.
        Is uterine papillary serous adenocarcinoma a manifestation of the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome?.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2000; 79: 477-481
        • Levine D.A.
        • Lin O.
        • Barakat R.R.
        • Robson M.E.
        • McDermott D.
        • Cohen L.
        • et al.
        Risk of endometrial carcinoma associated with BRCA mutation.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2001; 80: 395-398
        • Bruchim I.
        • Amichay K.
        • Kidron D.
        • Attias Z.
        • Biron-Shental T.
        • Drucker L.
        • et al.
        BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Jewish patients with uterine serous carcinoma.
        Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2010; 20: 1148-1153
        • Lavie O.
        • Ben-Arie A.
        • Segev Y.
        • Faro J.
        • Barak F.
        • Haya N.
        • et al.
        BRCA germline mutations in women with uterine serous carcinoma—still a debate.
        Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2010; 20: 1531-1534
        • Shu C.A.
        • Pike M.C.
        • Jotwani A.R.
        • Friebel T.M.
        • Soslow R.A.
        • Levine D.A.
        • et al.
        Uterine cancer after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy without hysterectomy in women with BRCA mutations.
        JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2: 1434-1440
        • Kurian A.W.
        • Sigal B.M.
        • Plevritis S.K.
        Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2010; 28 (Epub 2009/12/10): 222-231
      2. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 2015 Sub (1973–2013) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> − Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969–2014 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, (released April 2016, based on the November 2015 submission).

        • Havrilesky L.J.
        • Chino J.
        • Myers E.R.
        How much is another randomized trial of lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer worth? A value of information analysis.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2013; 131 (Epub 2013/06/27): 140-146
        • Arias E.
        United States life tables, 2011.
        Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 2015; 64: 1-63
        • Sanders G.D.
        • Neumann P.J.
        • Basu A.
        • Brock D.W.
        • Feeny D.
        • Krahn M.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine.
        JAMA. 2016; 316: 1093-1103
        • Babalola E.O.
        • Bharucha A.E.
        • Schleck C.D.
        • Gebhart J.B.
        • Zinsmeister A.R.
        • Melton 3rd., L.J.
        Decreasing utilization of hysterectomy: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1965–2002.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 196 (214 e1–214 e7)
        • Wright J.D.
        • Kostolias A.
        • Ananth C.V.
        • Burke W.M.
        • Tergas A.I.
        • Prendergast E.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of robotically assisted compared with laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign gynecologic disease.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 124: 886-896
        • Wright J.D.
        • Burke W.M.
        • Wilde E.T.
        • Lewin S.N.
        • Charles A.S.
        • Kim J.H.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2012; 30 (Epub 2012/02/01): 783-791
        • Wright J.D.
        • Ananth C.V.
        • Lewin S.N.
        • Burke W.M.
        • Lu Y.S.
        • Neugut A.I.
        • et al.
        Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
        JAMA. 2013; 309: 689-698
        • Aarts J.W.
        • Nieboer T.E.
        • Johnson N.
        • Tavender E.
        • Garry R.
        • Mol B.W.
        • et al.
        Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 8CD003677
        • Barnett J.C.
        • Judd J.P.
        • Wu J.M.
        • Scales Jr., C.D.
        • Myers E.R.
        • Havrilesky L.J.
        Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 116 (Epub 2010/08/25): 685-693
        • Wright K.N.
        • Jonsdottir G.M.
        • Jorgensen S.
        • Shah N.
        • Einarsson J.I.
        Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
        JSLS. 2012; 16: 519-524
        • Yabroff K.R.
        • Lamont E.B.
        • Mariotto A.
        • Warren J.L.
        • Topor M.
        • Meekins A.
        • et al.
        Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States.
        J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008; 100 (Epub 2008/05/01): 630-641
        • Halfhill T.
        Tom's Inflation Calculator.
        ([cited 2016 8/15/16]; Available from:)
        • (NIS) HNIS
        Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP).
        2012
        • Finch A.
        • Metcalfe K.A.
        • Chiang J.K.
        • Elit L.
        • McLaughlin J.
        • Springate C.
        • et al.
        The impact of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy on menopausal symptoms and sexual function in women who carry a BRCA mutation.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2011; 121: 163-168
        • Tucker P.E.
        • Bulsara M.K.
        • Salfinger S.G.
        • Tan J.J.
        • Green H.
        • Cohen P.A.
        Prevalence of sexual dysfunction after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2016; 140: 95-100
        • Kuppermann M.
        • Learman L.A.
        • Schembri M.
        • Gregorich S.E.
        • Jackson R.A.
        • Jacoby A.
        • et al.
        Contributions of hysterectomy and uterus-preserving surgery to health-related quality of life.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 122: 15-25
        • Humalajarvi N.
        • Aukee P.
        • Kairaluoma M.V.
        • Stach-Lempinen B.
        • Sintonen H.
        • Valpas A.
        • et al.
        Quality of life and pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms after hysterectomy with or without pelvic organ prolapse.
        Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014; 182: 16-21
        • Kwon J.S.
        • Sun C.C.
        • Peterson S.K.
        • White K.G.
        • Daniels M.S.
        • Boyd-Rogers S.G.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of prevention strategies for gynecologic cancers in lynch syndrome.
        Cancer. 2008; 113: 326-335