Advertisement

A model for estimating ovarian cancer risk: Application for preventive oophorectomy

Published:September 02, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.08.020

      Highlights

      • 13% of all ovarian cancers in Ontario occur in the 0.7% of women above 5% risk.
      • BRCA1/2 mutations account for 89% of ovarian cancer patients at high risk.
      • Achieving maximum impact will require population-based genetic testing of BRCA1/2.

      Abstract

      Objective

      It is important to identify women in the population who have a high risk of ovarian cancer and who might benefit from prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The probability that a woman will develop ovarian cancer depends on her current age, her reproductive history and her genetic status.

      Methods

      We simulated the distribution of ovarian cancer risk for the 2011 Ontario female population. We generated (at random) individual risks of ovarian cancer to age 80 for 6,301,340 women, based on the published risk factors, mutation frequencies and population age-specific incidence rates (SEER database). Risk factors included parity, breastfeeding, oral contraceptives, tubal ligation and family history. Genetic factors included 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and BRCA1/2 mutations.

      Results

      Of the 6,301,340 women simulated as the general population of Ontario, the (complete) model predicts that 65,805 women (1.0%) will develop ovarian cancer by age 80. There were 46,069 women (0.7%) with a risk of ovarian cancer above 5%. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers accounted for 67.4% of the women at greater than 5% risk (31,028 women). Among ovarian cancer patients at greater than 5% risk, a BRCA1/2 mutation was present in 89.2%. In contrast, SNPs contribute to a very small proportion of the ovarian cancer patients who were at greater than 5% risk.

      Conclusions

      Approximately 12.9% of all ovarian cancers in Ontario occur in the 0.7% of women in the general population who have a lifetime ovarian cancer risk in excess of 5%, the majority of whom carry a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gynecologic Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Canadian Cancer Society's Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics, Canadian Cancer Statistics.
        Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON2014
        • Whittemore A.S.
        • Harris R.
        • Itnyre J.
        Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. II. Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers in white women. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group.
        Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992; 136: 1184-1203
        • Zhang S.
        • et al.
        Frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 1342 unselected patients with invasive ovarian cancer.
        Gynecol. Oncol. 2011; 121: 353-357
        • Pearce C.L.
        • et al.
        Combined and interactive effects of environmental and GWAS-identified risk factors in ovarian cancer.
        Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2013; 22: 880-890
        • Loveday C.
        • et al.
        Germline RAD51C mutations confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer.
        Nat. Genet. 2012; 44 (author reply 476): 475-476
        • Loveday C.
        • et al.
        Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer.
        Nat. Genet. 2011; 43: 879-882
        • Pal T.
        • et al.
        Frequency of mutations in mismatch repair genes in a population-based study of women with ovarian cancer.
        Br. J. Cancer. 2012; 107: 1783-1790
        • Kuchenbaecker K.B.
        • et al.
        Identification of six new susceptibility loci for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.
        Nat. Genet. 2015; 47: 164-171
        • Finch A.P.
        • et al.
        Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2014; 32: 1547-1553
        • Parker W.H.
        • et al.
        Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses' health study.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 113: 1027-1037
        • Pokras R.H.V.
        Hysterectomies in the United States, 1965–84.
        in: V.a.H. Statistics U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington1987
      2. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, an integrated map of genetic variation from 1092 human genomes.
        Nature. 2012; 491: 56-65
        • Pearce C.L.
        • et al.
        Population distribution of lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in the United States.
        Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2015; 24: 671-676
      3. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (http://www.ser.cancer.gov) Research Data (1973–2011), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, Released April 2014, based on the November 2013 submission.

        • Kotsopoulos J.
        • et al.
        The relationship between bilateral oophorectomy and plasma hormone levels in postmenopausal women.
        Hormones Cancer. 2015; 6: 54-63
        • Finch A.
        • et al.
        The impact of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy on quality of life and psychological distress in women with a BRCA mutation.
        Psychooncology. 2013; 22: 212-219
        • Finch A.
        • et al.
        Preventing ovarian cancer through genetic testing: a population-based study.
        Clin. Genet. 2014; 86: 496-499
        • Kim H.S.
        • et al.
        Risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis.
        Br. J. Cancer. 2014; 110: 1878-1890
        • Jervis S.
        • et al.
        A risk prediction algorithm for ovarian cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2, common alleles and other familial effects.
        J. Med. Genet. 2015; 52: 465-475
        • Walker J.L.
        • et al.
        Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer.
        Cancer. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29321
        • Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer
        Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls.
        Lancet. 2008; 371: 303-314